Figures & data
Table 1 Subject characteristics by group
Table 2 Dietary analysis from 2 day food log, not including study supplementation
Table 3 Baseline measures of isometric and isokinetic muscle function
Fig. 2 The Impact of Supplementation (CHO, PRO, PRO + AO) on Absolute Isometric Muscle Function (Panel a) and Change in Isometric Muscle Function from Baseline (Panel b). * p < 0.05 individual time points vs. baseline. Data are mean ± SE
![](/cms/asset/77fe8a74-9981-45c5-8cf3-c6f939298ade/rssn_a_12129992_f0002_oc.gif)
Fig. 3 The Impact of Supplementation (CHO, PRO, PRO + AO) on Absolute Isokinetic Muscle Function (Panel a) and Change in Isokinetic Muscle Function from Baseline (Panel b). * p < 0.05 individual time points vs. baseline; ** p < 0.05 CHO vs. PRO and PRO + AO. Data are mean ± SE
![](/cms/asset/21a40afd-04ef-4722-840b-5169db5cb010/rssn_a_12129992_f0003_oc.gif)
Fig. 4 The Impact of Supplementation on Changes in Muscle Soreness and Swelling. a Unweighted Visual analog scale for soreness, b Weighted VAS for soreness, and c Change in Thigh Circumference (CHO n = 14, PRO n = 16, PRO + AO n = 17). *p < 0.05 individual time points vs. baseline; ** p = 0.027, CHO vs. PRO + AO. Data are mean ± SE
![](/cms/asset/18d1fa7c-0e09-45b9-be05-b954e3f2b202/rssn_a_12129992_f0004_oc.gif)