Figures & data
Table 1 Studies included in the analysis: summary of study designs
Fig. 2 Forest plot showing differences between the effects of placebo and caffeine trials on measures of maximal muscular strength. The size of the plotted squares reflects the relative statistical weight of each study. The numbers on the x-axis denote the standardized mean differences expressed as Hedge’s g. The horizontal lines denote the respective 95% confidence intervals (CI)
![](/cms/asset/fe5e1c79-b294-4768-8590-081117f523cb/rssn_a_12130030_f0002_oc.gif)
Fig. 3 Forest plot showing differences between the effects of placebo and caffeine trials on measures of upper-body maximal muscle strength. The size of the plotted squares reflects the relative statistical weight of each study. The numbers on the x-axis denote the standardized mean differences expressed as Hedge’s g. The horizontal lines denote the respective 95% confidence intervals (CI)
![](/cms/asset/fc38be7a-05aa-4d0a-80df-fde89327c204/rssn_a_12130030_f0003_oc.gif)
Fig. 4 Forest plot showing differences between the effects of placebo and caffeine trials on measures of lower-body maximal muscle strength. The size of the plotted squares reflects the relative statistical weight of each study. The numbers on the x-axis denote the standardized mean differences expressed as Hedge’s g. The horizontal lines denote the respective 95% confidence intervals (CI)
![](/cms/asset/c344dfbd-b9a6-4e55-81be-aa319d6d9716/rssn_a_12130030_f0004_oc.gif)
Table 2 Results from the subgroup meta-analyses
Fig. 5 Forest plot showing differences between the effects of placebo and caffeine trials on measures of muscle power expressed as vertical jump height. The size of the plotted squares reflects the relative statistical weight of each study. The numbers on the x-axis denote the standardized mean differences expressed as Hedge’s g. The horizontal lines denote the respective 95% confidence intervals (CI)
![](/cms/asset/ee165933-bec9-44ca-a51b-4b5790c0cd8c/rssn_a_12130030_f0005_oc.gif)