Abstract
Stress urinary incontinence is a prevalent symptom among women. It also affects men, primarily those operated on for prostate disease. Even though it is not life threatening, it seriously impacts quality of life. Bulking agents have been used in the treatment of incontinence for many decades, offering a treatment option for both women and men. Their short-term efficacy is satisfactory, but there is concern regarding durability of effect. Despite concerns regarding efficacy, the minimally invasive nature of the technique, with uncommon and self-limited complications, has made injectables quite popular among both physicians and patients. In light of recent developments in the surgical treatment of incontinence, resulting in highly efficacious, but also easy and safe-to-perform, procedures, the role of injectables must be re-evaluated. In these cost-conscious times, health economics is also an important issue, and comparative cost-effectiveness assessment of available treatment options is becoming imperative.