Abstract
The cost impact of late-stage failures of drug candidates has motivated the pharmaceutical industry to develop, validate, and implement a more proactive testing paradigm, including an emphasis on conducting predictive in vitro and in vivo studies earlier. The goal of drug discovery toxicology is not to reduce or eliminate attrition, as is often mis-stated as such, but rather to reprioritize efforts to shift attrition of future failing molecules upstream in discovery. This shift in attrition requires additional studies and investment earlier in the candidate evaluation process in order to avoid spending resources on molecules with soon-to-be-discovered development-limiting liabilities. While in silico and in vitro models will continually be developed and refined, in vivo preclinical safety models remain the gold standard for assessing human risk. For in vivo testing to influence early discovery effectively, it must: i) require low amounts of compound; ii) provide rapid results to drive decision-making and medicinal chemistry efforts; and iii) be flexible and provide results relevant to the development plan tailored to each target, drug class, and/or indication.