291
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

An Analysis of Methods for Quantifying Crappie Recruitment Variability

, &
Pages 1124-1135 | Received 22 Jun 2001, Accepted 18 Jan 2002, Published online: 08 Jan 2011
 

Abstract

We used catch-at-age data from 122 populations of crappies Pomoxis spp. from across the midwestern and southeastern United States to compare two methods for defining recruitment variability: (1) the recruitment coefficient of determination (RCD), calculated from the weighted linear regression of loge(catch at age + 1) on age, and (2) the recruitment variability index (RVI). Ranked values of the RCD and RVI were significantly correlated, which suggests that both indices measured variability in catch-at-age data in a similar manner. The recruitment categories of RCD and RVI agreed 52% of the time or were within one category of each other 89% of the time. Modeling indicated that the RCD and RVI provided theoretically valid measures of recent recruitment variability but were not suitable for assessing long-term recruitment patterns. Ranked values of RCD and RVI were not significantly associated with ranked coefficients of variation (100·SD/mean) in catch per unit effort (catch per trap-net night) of fully recruited crappies (age 1 or age 2) observed in long-term trap-net sampling. Studentized residuals resulting from RCD regressions failed to represent the fluctuations in year-class strength observed in long-term trap-net sampling for 15 of the 17 populations we examined. We conclude that the variability in crappie catch-at-age data that is not explained by annual mortality may not be entirely attributable to recruitment variability and could instead be a product of gear biases associated with fall trap-net sampling. The insensitivity of RVI to situations in which year-classes are weak rather than missing may limit its use as a measure of recruitment variability. Trends in recruitment detected in long-term, annual samples might provide the best means for assessing recruitment variability in fish populations. For infrequently sampled populations, methods such as RCD, RVI, and residual analysis may offer the only options for assessing recruitment patterns.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.