354
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Early Life History of Blueback Herring and Alewife in the Lower Roanoke River, North Carolina

, &
Pages 910-926 | Received 30 Mar 2004, Accepted 13 Jan 2005, Published online: 09 Jan 2011
 

Abstract

Seasonal distribution, abundance, habitat use, hatch dates, growth, and mortality of larval blueback herring Alosa aestivalis and alewife A. pseudoharengus were studied in the Roanoke River watershed, downstream from the Roanoke Rapids Dam in North Carolina. Ichthyoplankton was sampled from man-made canals, a creek, an oxbow, a flooded bottomland hardwood forest, the main river channel, and along the river's edge. To identify larval clupeids, we developed a dichotomous key for clupeids found in the study area using morphometric, meristic, and pigmentation characters synthesized from the literature. Distribution, abundance, and back-calculated hatch dates of larvae and eggs were used to describe spawning period, spawning habitat, and nursery habitat. Blueback herring and alewife eggs and larvae were present from early April through late May. Based on the presence of eggs and early-stage larvae, both species spawned in backwater tributary systems, including flooded bottomland hardwood forests. Our results indicated that blueback herring and alewives used a variety of habitats during early larval stages, though interspecific differences in concentration among habitats were evident. Blueback herring used both lotic (moving water) and lentic (still water) habitats, and alewives were more abundant in lentic habitats. Larval growth varied between years but not between species. Blueback herring growth rates were 0.60 mm/d in 1996 and 0.42 mm/d in 1997 compared with growth rates of 0.65 mm/d in 1996 and 0.41 mm/d in 1997 for alewives. Interspecific and between-year differences in daily mortality of preflexion blueback herring and alewives (age, 4–8 d) were observed. Blueback herring daily percent mortality in 1996 and 1997 was 99%, while alewife rates decreased from 98% in 1996 to 91% in 1997. Fluctuations in river flow affected habitat use; moderate to high discharge rates increased use of spawning and nursery habitats, and low flows reduced use of spawning habitat.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.