Figures & data
FIGURE 1. Geographical and geomorphologic location of the Foscagno Rock Glacier: (a) undifferentiated scree slopes and bedrock outcrops; (b) inactive rock glacier; (c) active rock glacier; (d) morainic deposits (Pleistocene age); (e) borehole location; (f) 14C ages (from CitationGuglielmin et al., 2001, modified)
![FIGURE 1. Geographical and geomorphologic location of the Foscagno Rock Glacier: (a) undifferentiated scree slopes and bedrock outcrops; (b) inactive rock glacier; (c) active rock glacier; (d) morainic deposits (Pleistocene age); (e) borehole location; (f) 14C ages (from CitationGuglielmin et al., 2001, modified)](/cms/asset/9bb186c9-bc9d-41c4-a012-dc6fb0212d21/uaar_a_11956976_f0001.gif)
FIGURE 2. Aerial view of Foscagno Valley and rock glacier. The white star indicates the location of the borehole
![FIGURE 2. Aerial view of Foscagno Valley and rock glacier. The white star indicates the location of the borehole](/cms/asset/287ed646-c042-49bd-abfc-320c31fe9f01/uaar_a_11956976_f0002.gif)
FIGURE 3. Stratigraphy of the borehole: (a) landslide deposit; (b) ablation till (Holocene); (c) massive ice body; (d) alternation of ice layers and ice-cemented debris flows sediments; (e) unfrozen ablation till (?). The bottom of the borehole is of phyllitic bedrock
![FIGURE 3. Stratigraphy of the borehole: (a) landslide deposit; (b) ablation till (Holocene); (c) massive ice body; (d) alternation of ice layers and ice-cemented debris flows sediments; (e) unfrozen ablation till (?). The bottom of the borehole is of phyllitic bedrock](/cms/asset/51f33831-96e5-4941-a5b4-61db10b4ebbe/uaar_a_11956976_f0003.gif)
FIGURE 4. (a) ice fragments of the upper part (2.5–4 m); (b) ice core between 4.1 and 5.6 m—note the subhorizontal foliations and debris bands; (c) ice core between 5.6 and 7.1 m; (d) permafrost core with some thin ice layers between 8.9 and 10 m. The top is always to the left
![FIGURE 4. (a) ice fragments of the upper part (2.5–4 m); (b) ice core between 4.1 and 5.6 m—note the subhorizontal foliations and debris bands; (c) ice core between 5.6 and 7.1 m; (d) permafrost core with some thin ice layers between 8.9 and 10 m. The top is always to the left](/cms/asset/f91ae452-95f0-4bfe-92b0-c446a875bd86/uaar_a_11956976_f0004.gif)
FIGURE 5. Crystal size measured with the linear intercept method on X and Z axes (DMx and DMz) and anisotropy ratio (Lx/Lz) patterns with depth in the ice body and relationships with the main debris bands
![FIGURE 5. Crystal size measured with the linear intercept method on X and Z axes (DMx and DMz) and anisotropy ratio (Lx/Lz) patterns with depth in the ice body and relationships with the main debris bands](/cms/asset/fa5a4eb1-f042-4a87-a2f1-5d4deea4b97d/uaar_a_11956976_f0005.gif)
FIGURE 6. Pictures of thin sections of ice and corresponding Schmidt diagrams at different depths. (a) ice type a (cf. the text) at 4 m depth; (b) ice type b at 5.1 m depth; (c) ice type c at 5.7 m depth
![FIGURE 6. Pictures of thin sections of ice and corresponding Schmidt diagrams at different depths. (a) ice type a (cf. the text) at 4 m depth; (b) ice type b at 5.1 m depth; (c) ice type c at 5.7 m depth](/cms/asset/0de06b09-2b60-47ec-915d-e873793dffe6/uaar_a_11956976_f0006.gif)
FIGURE 7. Depth profile of selected ions: (a) sulfate; (b) nitrate; (c) ammonium (expressed as &mu= L−1) with superimposed debris layers
![FIGURE 7. Depth profile of selected ions: (a) sulfate; (b) nitrate; (c) ammonium (expressed as &mu= L−1) with superimposed debris layers](/cms/asset/24c24fe7-1c9d-488a-91b9-4cc43819e624/uaar_a_11956976_f0007.gif)
Table 1 Arithmetic mean of ion concentrations (expressed in meqL −1) of the different ice core layers; in parentheses one standard deviation is reported; N is number of samples
Table 2 Comparison of nitrate and sulfate data measured in different types of Italian and Swiss glaciers and rock glaciers