Figures & data
TABLE 1 Mycorrhizal and functional types of the studied plant species.
TABLE 2 Results of nested ANOVA (species are nested in functional type) for nitrogen concentration and δ15N.
TABLE 3 Leaf N concentration and δ15N for studied alpine species from different functional types (see for abbreviations).
FIGURE 1. Leaf N concentration for different functional types of alpine plants (mean and standard error) (see for abbreviations). Significant (p < 0.05) differences are shown by different letters.
![FIGURE 1. Leaf N concentration for different functional types of alpine plants (mean and standard error) (see Table 1 for abbreviations). Significant (p < 0.05) differences are shown by different letters.](/cms/asset/ccc2dd5f-31ea-4075-8e30-0e099d29aff9/uaar_a_11957761_f0006.jpg)
FIGURE 2. Leaf N concentration and δ15N for 3 nitrogen fixing and one non-fixing (Trifolium polyphyllum) legumes in the alpine lichen heath. Significant (p < 0.05) differences are shown by different letters.
![FIGURE 2. Leaf N concentration and δ15N for 3 nitrogen fixing and one non-fixing (Trifolium polyphyllum) legumes in the alpine lichen heath. Significant (p < 0.05) differences are shown by different letters.](/cms/asset/a18755f0-0bd8-47cb-81f1-0b904c8f0ff3/uaar_a_11957761_f0007.jpg)
FIGURE 3. Relationship between N leaf concentration and rate of mycorrhizal infection (%) for 6 arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) plant species.
![FIGURE 3. Relationship between N leaf concentration and rate of mycorrhizal infection (%) for 6 arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) plant species.](/cms/asset/663fead9-6a92-412b-8a82-05b38511cfa4/uaar_a_11957761_f0008.jpg)