1,200
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Dynamic Process Analysis and Hazard Prediction of Debris Flow in Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Area—A Case Study at Ridi Gully

, , , &
Pages 373-390 | Received 07 Feb 2017, Accepted 03 May 2017, Published online: 19 Jan 2018

Figures & data

FIGURE 1. Location of the study area in eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau area, China.

FIGURE 1. Location of the study area in eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau area, China.

TABLE 1 Topographical parameters of channels in Ridi Gully.

Table 2 Statistical results at each slope classification of Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 2. Sources of loose solid materials for debris flow. (a) Slope failure, (b) bank collapse, and (c) moraine deposit.

FIGURE 2. Sources of loose solid materials for debris flow. (a) Slope failure, (b) bank collapse, and (c) moraine deposit.

FIGURE 3. The average monthly precipitation at Kangding and Luding meteorological stations in the study area.

FIGURE 3. The average monthly precipitation at Kangding and Luding meteorological stations in the study area.

FIGURE 4. The longitudinal profile of main channel of Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 4. The longitudinal profile of main channel of Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 5. The grain-size distribution of the debris flow deposits in Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 5. The grain-size distribution of the debris flow deposits in Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 6. Malvern curve of sample #1 in Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 6. Malvern curve of sample #1 in Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 7. Malvern curve of sample #2 in Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 7. Malvern curve of sample #2 in Ridi Gully.

TABLE 3 Basic parameters and flood peak discharge of Ridi Gully.

TABLE 4 Debris flow peak discharge of Ridi Gully.

TABLE 5 Debris flow velocity of Ridi Gully

TABLE 6 The total volume of one debris flow and the total amount of solid material in Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 8. The snapshots of flow depth in Ridi Gully following a 100-year return period precipitation. (a) t = 150 s, (b) t = 600 s, (c) t = 900 s, and (d) t = 1500 s.

FIGURE 8. The snapshots of flow depth in Ridi Gully following a 100-year return period precipitation. (a) t = 150 s, (b) t = 600 s, (c) t = 900 s, and (d) t = 1500 s.

FIGURE 9. The snapshots of flow depth in Ridi Gully following a 200-year return period precipitation. (a) t = 150 s, (b) t = 600 s, (c) t = 900 s, and (d) t = 1500 s.

FIGURE 9. The snapshots of flow depth in Ridi Gully following a 200-year return period precipitation. (a) t = 150 s, (b) t = 600 s, (c) t = 900 s, and (d) t = 1500 s.

FIGURE 10. The section profile of Sichuan-Tibet Railway across Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 10. The section profile of Sichuan-Tibet Railway across Ridi Gully.

FIGURE 11. Simulated results of the Sichuan-Tibet Railway section in Ridi Gully. (a) Simulated result following a 100-year return period precipitation. (b) Simulated result following a 200-year return period precipitation.

FIGURE 11. Simulated results of the Sichuan-Tibet Railway section in Ridi Gully. (a) Simulated result following a 100-year return period precipitation. (b) Simulated result following a 200-year return period precipitation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.