11,723
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reports

Highly Efficient Library Preparation for Ion Torrent Sequencing Using Y-Adapters

&
Pages 229-237 | Received 29 Mar 2019, Accepted 06 Aug 2019, Published online: 17 Oct 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. General overview of a generic library preparation workflow with the different concepts of sticky- and blunt-end ligation employing Y-adapters and linear adapters, respectively.

Y-adapters are ligated in a sticky-end fashion to the fragment, thereby yielding library molecules, of which both strands fulfill the prerequisites for sequencing. By contrast, two different linear adapters that are ligated in a blunt-end mechanism beside the functional library molecule (A-P1) also create nonsequenceable molecules as byproducts (A-A, P1-P1), resulting in lower conversion of sample DNA to functional library. Additionally, blunt-end ligation increases the chances for the formation of unwanted adapter dimers and input fragment concatemers.

Figure 1. General overview of a generic library preparation workflow with the different concepts of sticky- and blunt-end ligation employing Y-adapters and linear adapters, respectively.Y-adapters are ligated in a sticky-end fashion to the fragment, thereby yielding library molecules, of which both strands fulfill the prerequisites for sequencing. By contrast, two different linear adapters that are ligated in a blunt-end mechanism beside the functional library molecule (A-P1) also create nonsequenceable molecules as byproducts (A-A, P1-P1), resulting in lower conversion of sample DNA to functional library. Additionally, blunt-end ligation increases the chances for the formation of unwanted adapter dimers and input fragment concatemers.
Figure 2. Schematic architecture of a custom Y-adapter comprising the necessary structural elements for Ion Torrent sequencing.
Figure 2. Schematic architecture of a custom Y-adapter comprising the necessary structural elements for Ion Torrent sequencing.
Figure 3. Summary of construction and results obtained with the initial Y-adapters.

(A) Initial design of the stem regions with three different barcodes (BC-042, 043, 044) and two variants each of the stem length. The bar plot shows the library yield (upper x-axis), with 500 ng Escherichia coli DNA input for each of the designs; mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification. ×: Melting temperature (lower x-axis) of the respective stem. (B) Size distribution of the generated libraries as determined by Bioanalyzer high-sensitivity DNA analysis. (C) Read length histogram of sequencing results of equimolar pools of the long and short adapters in one run each, respectively. For comparison, please see B showing the expected size distributions.

Figure 3. Summary of construction and results obtained with the initial Y-adapters. (A) Initial design of the stem regions with three different barcodes (BC-042, 043, 044) and two variants each of the stem length. The bar plot shows the library yield (upper x-axis), with 500 ng Escherichia coli DNA input for each of the designs; mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification. ×: Melting temperature (lower x-axis) of the respective stem. (B) Size distribution of the generated libraries as determined by Bioanalyzer high-sensitivity DNA analysis. (C) Read length histogram of sequencing results of equimolar pools of the long and short adapters in one run each, respectively. For comparison, please see Figure 7B showing the expected size distributions.
Figure 3. Summary of construction and results obtained with the initial Y-adapters. (A) Initial design of the stem regions with three different barcodes (BC-042, 043, 044) and two variants each of the stem length. The bar plot shows the library yield (upper x-axis), with 500 ng Escherichia coli DNA input for each of the designs; mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification. ×: Melting temperature (lower x-axis) of the respective stem. (B) Size distribution of the generated libraries as determined by Bioanalyzer high-sensitivity DNA analysis. (C) Read length histogram of sequencing results of equimolar pools of the long and short adapters in one run each, respectively. For comparison, please see Figure 7B showing the expected size distributions.
Figure 4. Influence of the stem melting temperature on library yield.

Design of the stem regions with three different barcodes and varying numbers of inosine nucleotides (bold). Input: 250 ng of cell culture DNA. The barplot shows the library yield (upper x-axis) for each of the designs, mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification.

×: Melting temperature (lower x-axis) of the respective stem.

Figure 4. Influence of the stem melting temperature on library yield.Design of the stem regions with three different barcodes and varying numbers of inosine nucleotides (bold). Input: 250 ng of cell culture DNA. The barplot shows the library yield (upper x-axis) for each of the designs, mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification.×: Melting temperature (lower x-axis) of the respective stem.
Figure 5. Influence of phosphorothioate bonds on library yield.

Design of the top oligonucleotides with barcode BC-042 and varying numbers of phosphorothioate bonds and different positions. Libraries were prepared from 500 ng fragmented Escherichia coli DNA in two independent experiments. The bar plot shows the library yield for each of the designs; mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification. Colored adapter sequence: Black: primer binding sites; red: key; blue: barcode; green: barcode end signal. The adapter part forming the double-stranded stem is shown with grey background.

*Phosphorothioate bonds.

Figure 5. Influence of phosphorothioate bonds on library yield.Design of the top oligonucleotides with barcode BC-042 and varying numbers of phosphorothioate bonds and different positions. Libraries were prepared from 500 ng fragmented Escherichia coli DNA in two independent experiments. The bar plot shows the library yield for each of the designs; mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification. Colored adapter sequence: Black: primer binding sites; red: key; blue: barcode; green: barcode end signal. The adapter part forming the double-stranded stem is shown with grey background.*Phosphorothioate bonds.
Figure 6. Influence of Y-adapters on library yield and quality at low DNA input.

(A) Library concentration after library preparation without and with 2, 10 and 50 ng fragmented Escherichia coli DNA input. For optimal comparability, experiments were performed in duplicates with standard adapter BC-042 and Y-adapter BC-042, respectively. Mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification. (B) Melting curves generated after qPCR quantification for 2- and 10-ng DNA input, visualizing the presence of adapter dimers. Reference was assembled of single peaks for nontemplate control (primer dimer; yellow), library without input (adapter dimer; red) and library quantification standard (153 bp; black).

Figure 6. Influence of Y-adapters on library yield and quality at low DNA input. (A) Library concentration after library preparation without and with 2, 10 and 50 ng fragmented Escherichia coli DNA input. For optimal comparability, experiments were performed in duplicates with standard adapter BC-042 and Y-adapter BC-042, respectively. Mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification. (B) Melting curves generated after qPCR quantification for 2- and 10-ng DNA input, visualizing the presence of adapter dimers. Reference was assembled of single peaks for nontemplate control (primer dimer; yellow), library without input (adapter dimer; red) and library quantification standard (153 bp; black).
Figure 7. Performance of optimized custom Y-adapters.

(A) Eight optimized Y-adapters for Ion Torrent sequencing were compared on their ligation efficiency when ligated to the same fragmented Escherichia coli DNA, 500 ng, in two or three (BC-009, BC-042) independent experiments. The plot shows the library yield for each of the adapters; mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification. The horizontal line indicates the mean concentration of all libraries shown in the plot, the dashed lines indicate the mean ± 1 standard deviation. (B) Key metrics of sequence data generated on an Ion S5 XL using standard Ion Torrent adapters or custom Y-adapters. Read length histograms for E. coli libraries prepared using Y-adapters (top) or standard adapters (bottom). (C) Quality plot of the same libraries after trimming to a uniform sequence length and number of bases.

Figure 7. Performance of optimized custom Y-adapters. (A) Eight optimized Y-adapters for Ion Torrent sequencing were compared on their ligation efficiency when ligated to the same fragmented Escherichia coli DNA, 500 ng, in two or three (BC-009, BC-042) independent experiments. The plot shows the library yield for each of the adapters; mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification. The horizontal line indicates the mean concentration of all libraries shown in the plot, the dashed lines indicate the mean ± 1 standard deviation. (B) Key metrics of sequence data generated on an Ion S5 XL using standard Ion Torrent adapters or custom Y-adapters. Read length histograms for E. coli libraries prepared using Y-adapters (top) or standard adapters (bottom). (C) Quality plot of the same libraries after trimming to a uniform sequence length and number of bases.
Figure 7. Performance of optimized custom Y-adapters. (A) Eight optimized Y-adapters for Ion Torrent sequencing were compared on their ligation efficiency when ligated to the same fragmented Escherichia coli DNA, 500 ng, in two or three (BC-009, BC-042) independent experiments. The plot shows the library yield for each of the adapters; mean and standard deviation were calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification. The horizontal line indicates the mean concentration of all libraries shown in the plot, the dashed lines indicate the mean ± 1 standard deviation. (B) Key metrics of sequence data generated on an Ion S5 XL using standard Ion Torrent adapters or custom Y-adapters. Read length histograms for E. coli libraries prepared using Y-adapters (top) or standard adapters (bottom). (C) Quality plot of the same libraries after trimming to a uniform sequence length and number of bases.
Figure 8. Yield for libraries prepared from three distinct field samples using custom Y-adapters or standard adapters with different DNA input as indicated at the top.

Shown are the mean yield, including standard deviation calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification.

Figure 8. Yield for libraries prepared from three distinct field samples using custom Y-adapters or standard adapters with different DNA input as indicated at the top.Shown are the mean yield, including standard deviation calculated from three dilutions used in qPCR quantification.
Supplemental material

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Download MS Word (44.7 KB)

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Download PDF (940.8 KB)