1,524
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Series

Avapritinib in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Case Series and Review of the Literature From a Tertiary Care Center in India

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Article: FSO676 | Received 15 Oct 2020, Accepted 21 Dec 2020, Published online: 19 Jan 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Response to imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib therapy in case 1.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) done post imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib therapy in patient A. (A) maximum intensity projection, (B, C & D) axial contrast enhanced CT and (E, F & G) fused PET/CT images showing multiple solid cystic masses with increased FDG uptake in the enhancing solid component (arrows) suggestive of metabolically active liver metastases. Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT done 3 months after initiation of avapritinib therapy, which revealed resolution of metabolic activity in the corresponding lesions (H–N) with hypodense/cystic changes in the previously enhancing lesions, suggestive of complete metabolic response.

Figure 1. Response to imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib therapy in case 1. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) done post imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib therapy in patient A. (A) maximum intensity projection, (B, C & D) axial contrast enhanced CT and (E, F & G) fused PET/CT images showing multiple solid cystic masses with increased FDG uptake in the enhancing solid component (arrows) suggestive of metabolically active liver metastases. Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT done 3 months after initiation of avapritinib therapy, which revealed resolution of metabolic activity in the corresponding lesions (H–N) with hypodense/cystic changes in the previously enhancing lesions, suggestive of complete metabolic response.
Figure 2. Response to avapritinib therapy in case 1.

1 8F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) done 6 months after avapritinib therapy in patient A. (A) Maximum intensity projection, (B, C & D) axial contrast enhanced CT and (E, F & G) fused PET/CT images shows increase in size of the liver lesions with FDG avid enhancing areas in the periphery of the lesion (arrows), suggestive of progressive disease.

Figure 2. Response to avapritinib therapy in case 1. 1 8F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) done 6 months after avapritinib therapy in patient A. (A) Maximum intensity projection, (B, C & D) axial contrast enhanced CT and (E, F & G) fused PET/CT images shows increase in size of the liver lesions with FDG avid enhancing areas in the periphery of the lesion (arrows), suggestive of progressive disease.
Figure 3. Subdural haemorrhage in case 2.

Computed tomography head of patient B showing biconcave hyperdensity in the right parieto-occipital location with associated midline shift suggestive of subdural hemorrhage.

Figure 3. Subdural haemorrhage in case 2.Computed tomography head of patient B showing biconcave hyperdensity in the right parieto-occipital location with associated midline shift suggestive of subdural hemorrhage.
Figure 4. Response to imatinib in case 5.

(1A) Axial computed tomography abdomen of patient E showing a heterogenous mass measuring 7.1 × 6.6 cm in the surgical bed in the gastro-hepatic region and a hypodense lesion in segment IVB of liver (1B) measuring1.5 × 1.8 cm. (2A) Axial CT abdomen of first follow-up scan showing a heterogenous mass measuring10.2 × 10.7 cm in the surgical bed in the gastro-hepatic region and a hypodense lesion in segment IVB of the liver measuring 2.9 × 2.8cm (2B), suggestive of disease progression.

Figure 4. Response to imatinib in case 5.(1A) Axial computed tomography abdomen of patient E showing a heterogenous mass measuring 7.1 × 6.6 cm in the surgical bed in the gastro-hepatic region and a hypodense lesion in segment IVB of liver (1B) measuring1.5 × 1.8 cm. (2A) Axial CT abdomen of first follow-up scan showing a heterogenous mass measuring10.2 × 10.7 cm in the surgical bed in the gastro-hepatic region and a hypodense lesion in segment IVB of the liver measuring 2.9 × 2.8cm (2B), suggestive of disease progression.
Figure 5. Response to avapritinib in case 5.

(3A) In a patient with PDGFRA D842V mutation (patient E), maximum intensity projection image of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) showing physiologic biodistribution in the brain, liver, kidneys and urinary bladder. (3B) Axial CT abdomen showing a heterogenous mass measuring 5.5 × 6.0 cm in the surgical bed in the gastro-hepatic region and a hypodense lesion in the segment IVB of the liver 2.1 × 2.0 cm with no significant FDG uptake in any of the lesions on fused PET-CT images, suggestive of partial response (3C).

Figure 5. Response to avapritinib in case 5.(3A) In a patient with PDGFRA D842V mutation (patient E), maximum intensity projection image of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) showing physiologic biodistribution in the brain, liver, kidneys and urinary bladder. (3B) Axial CT abdomen showing a heterogenous mass measuring 5.5 × 6.0 cm in the surgical bed in the gastro-hepatic region and a hypodense lesion in the segment IVB of the liver 2.1 × 2.0 cm with no significant FDG uptake in any of the lesions on fused PET-CT images, suggestive of partial response (3C).

Table 1. Base line characteristics of patients.

Table 2. Avapritinib characteristics including response rates, progression free time, outcomes and toxicities.

Figure 6. Progression-free survival.
Figure 6. Progression-free survival.