The Readiness For Interprofessional Education (IPE) In The School Setting Among The Internship Students Of Applied Medical Sciences At Taibah University

Figures & data

Table 1 Evaluation Of Subscales According To Students, Response

Subscales	Response Of Students
	Strongly Agree	Agree	Total Frequency Agree (Strongly Agree And Agree)	Undecided	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	Total Frequency (Disagree And Strongly Disagree)
Teamwork and collaboration	184 (51%)	118 (32.78%)	88.78%	30 (20%)	24 (8.57%)	4 (5%)	13.57%
Negative professional ID	33 (20.62%)	26 (16.25%)	36.25%	21 (17.5%)	53 (33.13%)	27 (16.88%)	50.01%
Positive professional ID	64 (53.33%)	44 (33.33%)	86.66%	10 (8.33%)	1 (2.5)	1 (2.5%)	5%
Roles and responsibility	41 (34.17%)	39 (31.67%)	65.84	22 (13.33%)	13 (16.25%)	6 (7.5%)	23.75%

Table 2 The Relationship Between Subscales And Disciplines Of Students

Subscales	Diagnostic Radiologic Technology N=12	Medical Lab. Technology N=15	Clinical Nutrition N=13	Frequency	p-Value
Teamwork and collaboration	1.94 (0.99)	1.69 (0.93)	1.60 (0.68)	0.888	0.868
Negative professional ID	3.58 (1.24)	3.47 (1.50)	3.69 (1.18)	0.148	0.868
Positive professional ID	1.67 (0.60)	1.68 (0.92)	1.49 (0.57)	0.422	0.66
Roles and responsibility	2.25 (1.08)	2.27 (1)	2.10 (0.84)	1.00	0.48

Note: P-values < 0.05% were significant.

Table 3 The Attitude Of Internship Students Towards Teamwork And Collaboration

Status		N	Mean	SD	P-value
Shared learning will help me think positively about other healthcare professionals	Student at The beginning level of the internship	21	1.7619	0.94365	0.015
	Student at The end level of the internship	19	2.7368	1.44692
Learning to work, students/professionals need to respect and trust each other	Student at The beginning level of the internship	21	1.7619	1.13599	0.033
	Student at The end level of the internship	19	2.6316	1.34208

Note: P-values < 0.05% were significant.