Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/d4ce0ce0-f764-4811-8df7-89c54bf904dc/dame_a_12160657_uf0001_b.jpg)
Table 1 Scientific studies about clinical reasoning that has been title and abstract reviewed
Table 2 The list of 31 related literatures that included in the review
Table 3 The studies that deal with the concept of “script,” “schema,” and “illness script,” and their features, distinctions, and components
Table 4 The studies that deal with the formation and development of “illness script” during the acquisition of expertise and changes in the physician’s knowledge structure
Figure 2 Generic flow of events in a typical schema. D1: Decision No 1; D5: Decision No 6; F1: Finding No 1; F5: Finding No 5; H1: Hypothesis No 1; H2: Hypothesis No 2; I1: Inquiry No 1; I3: Inquiry No 3.
![Figure 2 Generic flow of events in a typical schema. D1: Decision No 1; D5: Decision No 6; F1: Finding No 1; F5: Finding No 5; H1: Hypothesis No 1; H2: Hypothesis No 2; I1: Inquiry No 1; I3: Inquiry No 3.](/cms/asset/dde60271-1f91-45a5-a138-8323719ca974/dame_a_12160657_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Script as a routinized pathway of previously used schema. D1: Decision No 1; D5: Decision No 6; F1: Finding No 1; F5: Finding No 5; H1: Hypothesis No 1; H2: Hypothesis No 2; I1: Inquiry No 1; I3: Inquiry No 3.
![Figure 3 Script as a routinized pathway of previously used schema. D1: Decision No 1; D5: Decision No 6; F1: Finding No 1; F5: Finding No 5; H1: Hypothesis No 1; H2: Hypothesis No 2; I1: Inquiry No 1; I3: Inquiry No 3.](/cms/asset/d4ba8268-83bb-489a-a256-a79ca622b7b6/dame_a_12160657_f0003_c.jpg)