Comparing the Efficacy of Chemical Cautery to Cryosurgery on CD4+ Status of HIV Patients with Condyloma Acuminata

Figures & data

Table 1 Demographic Characteristics of CA Patients in the Study

Variables	Condyloma Acuminata without HIV Infection, n = 37 (%); Mean ± SD	Condyloma Acuminata with HIV Infection, n = 41 (%); Mean ± SD	p-value
Sex			<0.010**
Male	17 (21.8)	36 (46.2)
Female	20 (25.6)	5 (6.4)
Age (years old)	30 ± 13.05	26 ± 7.23	0.140
15–19	1 (1.3)	3 (3.8)
20–24	6 (7.7)	14 (17.9)
25–29	8 (10.3)	12 (15.4)
30–34	7 (9.0)	5 (6.4)
35–39	6 (7.7)	4 (5.1)
40–44	2 (2.6)	1 (1.3)
45–49	1 (1.3)	2 (2.6)
50–54	2 (2.6)	0 (0.0)
≥ 55	4 (5.1)	0 (0.0)
Occupation			0.050*
High school student	1 (1.3)	3 (3.8)
University student	3 (3.8)	7 (9.0)
Housewife	7 (9.0)	1 (1.3)
Employee	16 (20.5)	20 (25.6)
Entrepreneur	6 (7.7)	10 (12.8)
Teacher	2 (2.6)	0 (0.0)
Civil servant	2 (2.6)	0 (0.0)
Sexual orientation			<0.010**
Heterosexual	29 (37.2)	13 (16.7)
Homosexual	4 (5.1)	20 (25.6)
Bisexual	4 (5.1)	8 (10.3)
Lesion site			<0.010**
Genital	26 (33.3)	11 (14.1)
Anorectal	6 (7.7)	24 (30.8)
Genital and anorectal	5 (6.4)	6 (7.7)
Treatment			0.148
Chemical cautery	29 (37.2)	26 (33.3)
Cryosurgery	8 (10.3)	15 (19.2)
Treatment duration (week)			0.592
Chemical cautery	15.72 ± 13.26	31.84 ± 34.23
Cryosurgery	22.50 ± 7.98	32 ± 23.51

Notes: *Statistical significant with p<0.05. **Statistical significant with p<0.01.

Abbreviation: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.

Table 2 Comparison of Treatment Efficacy on CD4+ Level in CA Patients with HIV Infection

Treatment	CD4+	F	Sig.
Chemical cautery (24 ± 23.07)	Pre	1.192	0.438
	Post	2.788	0.138
	Range	2.673	0.148
Cryosurgery (20 ± 23.64)	Pre	0.756	0.649
	Post	0.292	0.907
	Range	0.462	0.807