245
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Quantitative Assessment of the Cryolipolysis Method for Body Contouring in Asian Patients

& ORCID Icon
Pages 1773-1781 | Published online: 23 Nov 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1 Sex distribution of the patients. The sex distribution of patients in this series was 91.4% female, and 8.6% male.

Figure 1 Sex distribution of the patients. The sex distribution of patients in this series was 91.4% female, and 8.6% male.

Figure 2 Age distribution of the patients. The age distribution of patients in this series was 30% 30±39 years, 29% 20±29 years, 24% 40±49 years, 14% 50±59 years, and 3% ±19 years. The average age was 34.7 years.

Figure 2 Age distribution of the patients. The age distribution of patients in this series was 30% 30±39 years, 29% 20±29 years, 24% 40±49 years, 14% 50±59 years, and 3% ±19 years. The average age was 34.7 years.

Figure 3 Ethnic distribution of the patients. The ethnic distribution of patients in this series was 97.55% Japanese, 1.67% Chinese, and 0.78% other.

Figure 3 Ethnic distribution of the patients. The ethnic distribution of patients in this series was 97.55% Japanese, 1.67% Chinese, and 0.78% other.

Figure 4 Number of treatment cycles by anatomic site. Total treatments were delivered to the lower abdomen (24.9%), upper arms (17.1%), inner thigh (13.7%), and flank (11.5%).

Figure 4 Number of treatment cycles by anatomic site. Total treatments were delivered to the lower abdomen (24.9%), upper arms (17.1%), inner thigh (13.7%), and flank (11.5%).

Figure 5 Applicator use per site. CoolAdvantage used in 85%, CoolMini in 13%, and CoolSmooth Pro in 2% of all cycles.

Figure 5 Applicator use per site. CoolAdvantage used in 85%, CoolMini in 13%, and CoolSmooth Pro in 2% of all cycles.

Table 1 Changes in Average Circumference in Total of 5 Measured Positions in Abdomen and Upper Arm

Table 2 Questionnaire Results from Those Who Underwent a Treatment on the Abdomen/Upper Arms

Figure 6 Bruising after the treatment procedure on flanks.

Figure 6 Bruising after the treatment procedure on flanks.

Figure 7 (A) Baseline; (B) 3 months after abdominal treatment with a circumference change above navel of −6 cm.

Figure 7 (A) Baseline; (B) 3 months after abdominal treatment with a circumference change above navel of −6 cm.

Figure 8 (A) Baseline; (B) 1 month after 2 abdominal treatments. It visibly shows the reduction on lower abdomen and circumference reduction above navel of −10.7 cm.

Figure 8 (A) Baseline; (B) 1 month after 2 abdominal treatments. It visibly shows the reduction on lower abdomen and circumference reduction above navel of −10.7 cm.