175
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Therapeutic Efficacy of Bovine Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Combined with Ultrapulsed Fractional CO2 Laser in Acne Scars: Randomized Controlled Trial

, , , , &
Pages 2813-2819 | Received 28 Jun 2023, Accepted 14 Sep 2023, Published online: 10 Oct 2023

Figures & data

Table 1 Table of Clinical Baseline Information

Table 2 Comparison of Clinical Efficacy

Figure 1 Comparison of ECCA score and scar base depth (there were 60 cases in each of research and control groups). (A) ECCA score before and after treatment. (B) Scar base depth before and after treatment. #: vs before treatment, P<0.05. &: vs control group, P<0.05.

Figure 1 Comparison of ECCA score and scar base depth (there were 60 cases in each of research and control groups). (A) ECCA score before and after treatment. (B) Scar base depth before and after treatment. #: vs before treatment, P<0.05. &: vs control group, P<0.05.

Figure 2 Comparison of skin condition. (A) The pore value of the skin before and after treatment (there were 60 cases in each of research and control groups). (B) The texture value of the skin before and after treatment. #: vs before treatment, P<0.05. &: vs control group, P<0.05.

Figure 2 Comparison of skin condition. (A) The pore value of the skin before and after treatment (there were 60 cases in each of research and control groups). (B) The texture value of the skin before and after treatment. #: vs before treatment, P<0.05. &: vs control group, P<0.05.

Figure 3 Comparison of recovery time (there were 60 cases in each of research and control groups). (A) Comparison of duration of redness. (B) Comparison of scabbing. (C) Comparison of erythema. ##P<0.01.

Figure 3 Comparison of recovery time (there were 60 cases in each of research and control groups). (A) Comparison of duration of redness. (B) Comparison of scabbing. (C) Comparison of erythema. ##P<0.01.

Figure 4 Comparison of skin barrier function (there were 60 cases in each of research and control groups). (A) Skin water content before and after treatment. (B) Epidermal oil content before and after treatment. (C) TEWL before and after treatment. #: vs before treatment, P<0.05. &: vs control group, P<0.05.

Figure 4 Comparison of skin barrier function (there were 60 cases in each of research and control groups). (A) Skin water content before and after treatment. (B) Epidermal oil content before and after treatment. (C) TEWL before and after treatment. #: vs before treatment, P<0.05. &: vs control group, P<0.05.

Table 3 Incidence of Adverse Reactions

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.