141
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Predictive Factors Affecting the Maxillary Alveolar Bone Thickness: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

ORCID Icon
Pages 359-365 | Published online: 15 Sep 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1 CBCT Images generated parallel to the tooth axis in the: (A) axial, (B) coronal, and (C) sagittal planes. (D) Sagittal reconstruct showing measurements of the AMABT at alveolar crest, mid-root, and apex, as well as the Inc/PP angle.

Figure 1 CBCT Images generated parallel to the tooth axis in the: (A) axial, (B) coronal, and (C) sagittal planes. (D) Sagittal reconstruct showing measurements of the AMABT at alveolar crest, mid-root, and apex, as well as the Inc/PP angle.

Figure 2 CBCT Images generated parallel to the IC opening in the: (A) sagittal, (B) axial, and (C) coronal planes. (D) Sagittal reconstruct showing the measurement of the width of IC at the palatal opening measured on the horizontal orientation line.

Figure 2 CBCT Images generated parallel to the IC opening in the: (A) sagittal, (B) axial, and (C) coronal planes. (D) Sagittal reconstruct showing the measurement of the width of IC at the palatal opening measured on the horizontal orientation line.

Table 1 Descriptive Results of the Assessed Parameters (n=135)

Table 2 Association Between Inc/PP Angle and the AMABT at Three Levels (n=135). Significance Level is Set at P<0.05

Table 3 Association Between Width of the IC at the Palatal Opening in the Sagittal View and the AMABT at Three Levels (n=135). Significance Level is Set at P<0.05

Table 4 Association Between Age and the AMABT at Three Levels (n=135). Significance Level is Set at P<0.05

Table 5 Sex-Related Differences in the AMABT at Three Levels. Significance Level is Set at P<0.05