Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Primary Incisors Restored with Different Intracanal-Reinforcement Materials

Figures & data

Table 1 Comparing All Groups Average Fracture Resistance Using One Way Analysis of Variance

Groups	Mean [N]	Std. Deviation	ANOVA P-value	95% Confidence Interval for Mean
				Lower Bound	Upper Bound
Tetric^® N-Ceram Bulk Fill	239.91	93.57	0.0001*	161.68	318.14
AeliteFlo	375.74	19.73		359.25	392.23
Filtek Z250 XT	318.78	12.84		308.04	329.51
GC Fuji II LC^® Capsule	439.82	25.16		418.79	460.85
Control	423.37	178.71		258.09	588.65

Note: *Indicates statistical significance.

Table 2 Multiple Comparison Test Comparing Pairwise Groups Average Fracture Resistance

Groups	Multiple Comparison Test*
	Tetric^® N-Ceram Bulk Fill	AeliteFlo	Filtek Z250 XT	GC Fuji II LC^® Capsule	Control
Tetric^® N-Ceram Bulk Fill	1
AeliteFlo	0.030	1
Filtek Z250 XT	0.390	0.693	1
GC Fuji II LC^® Capsule	0.001	0.593	0.065	1
Control	0.002	0.830	0.168	0.996	1

Note: *Tukey’s test.

Figure 1 Comparing the groups by their mean fracture resistance.