Comparison of esophageal placement of Bravo capsule system under direct endoscopic guidance with conventional placement method

Aijaz A SofiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA

Charles FilipiakDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA

Thomas SodemanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA

Usman AhmadDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA

Ali NawrasDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA

Isam DaboulDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Comparison of esophageal placement of Bravo capsule system under direct endoscopic guidance with conventional placement method

Table 1 Patient demographics and indication for pH monitoring

Table 2 Adverse events in patients in the direct and indirect monitoring groups

Table 3 Patient tolerability and experience

Table 4 Mean time taken for the direct and indirect method of capsule placement

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Comparison of esophageal placement of Bravo capsule system under direct endoscopic guidance with conventional placement method

Figures & data

Table 1 Patient demographics and indication for pH monitoring

Table 2 Adverse events in patients in the direct and indirect monitoring groups

Table 3 Patient tolerability and experience

Table 4 Mean time taken for the direct and indirect method of capsule placement

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date