Figures & data
Figure 1 Cost utility decision tree model structure adaptation for Thailand.
![Figure 1 Cost utility decision tree model structure adaptation for Thailand.](/cms/asset/3951e68e-db83-4f3d-a228-c071f3665d8f/dceo_a_140902_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 1 Thailand cost data model inputs and cost calculation
Table 2 Calculation of average cost of treatment per child per adverse event (R+ORS and/or ORS alone)
Table 3 Budget impact calculation for the population cohort eligible for R+ORS and/or ORS alone
Table 4 Mean cost per patient for drugs, outpatient care, inpatient care and adverse events for R+ORS versus ORS alone
Figure 2 Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio on the cost utility plane.
![Figure 2 Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio on the cost utility plane.](/cms/asset/377b5ce8-17bf-40fb-bbf5-f89e49065992/dceo_a_140902_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 Tornado diagram of deterministic sensitivity analysis.
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; LOS, length of stay; ORS, oral rehydration solution; QoL, quality of life; R, racecadotril.
![Figure 3 Tornado diagram of deterministic sensitivity analysis.](/cms/asset/ff4b08bc-c116-467a-beeb-30d688f39130/dceo_a_140902_f0003_b.jpg)
Table 5 Budget impact results year 0 (current) to year 5, assuming 5% increase in market share for R+ORS
Figure 4 Percentage overall health expenditure current year (0) to year 5 for ORS and R+ORS
![Figure 4 Percentage overall health expenditure current year (0) to year 5 for ORS and R+ORS](/cms/asset/5c55cee0-6bdb-4a9e-94c0-e17ae11fc194/dceo_a_140902_f0004_b.jpg)
Table S1 Model adaptation Thailand: base case parameters