95
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Cost-consequence analysis of sitagliptin versus sulfonylureas as add-on therapy for the treatment of diabetic patients in Italy

, , , &
Pages 699-710 | Published online: 20 Nov 2017

Figures & data

Table 1 Parameters used to model clinical events, parameters’ value, and source of data

Table 2 Unit costs (Euros) associated with resource item and source of data

Table 3 Cost-consequence analysis SITA versus SU over 3-year time horizon (societal perspective)

Table 4 Cost-consequence analysis SITA versus SU over 3-year time horizon (INHS perspective)

Figure 1 Avoided events SITA+Met versus SU+Met.

Abbreviations: hypo, hypoglycemic event; MACE, major cardiovascular events; Met, metformin; SITA, sitagliptin; SU, sulfonylurea.
Figure 1 Avoided events SITA+Met versus SU+Met.

Table 5 Scenario analysis: cost-consequence analysis SITA versus SU over 3-year time horizon (societal perspective) without MACE

Table 6 Scenario analysis: cost-consequence analysis SITA versus SU over 3-year time horizon (INHS perspective) without MACE

Figure 2 One-way sensitivity analysis: tornado graph.

Abbreviations: hypo, hypoglycemic event; MACE, major cardiovascular events; Met, Metformin; SITA, sitagliptin; SMBG, self-monitoring of blood glucose; SU, sulfonylurea.
Figure 2 One-way sensitivity analysis: tornado graph.

Table S1 Details of data used to obtained average costs of drug costs for SU+Met

Table S2 Details of data used to value direct costs of MACE