229
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Intermittent pneumatic compression is a cost-effective method of orthopedic postsurgical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

, , , &
Pages 231-241 | Published online: 19 Apr 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1 Depiction of the two Markov models for (A) VTE and (B) VTE prophylaxis.

Abbreviations: DVT, deep-vein thrombosis; GI, gastrointestinal; HIT, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; PE, pulmonary embolism; PTS, postthrombotic syndrome; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Figure 1 Depiction of the two Markov models for (A) VTE and (B) VTE prophylaxis.

Table 1 Incidence of adverse events during VTE prophylaxis

Table 2 Cost and quality of life associated with VTE adverse events

Table 3 Clinical and economic outcomes estimated by the models

Table 4 Results from the scenario analyses

Figure 2 Cost-effectiveness plane for IPC and IPC+LMWH compared with LMWH alone.

Notes: The cost-effectiveness plane for IPC (open circles) and IPC+LMWH (gray stars) compared with LMWH alone in the USA (left) and Australia (right). The gray dashed line indicates the willingness-to-pay threshold, with points that are below and to the right of the line considered cost-effective.
Abbreviations: IPC, intermittent pneumatic compression; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; QALY, quality-adjusted life year.
Figure 2 Cost-effectiveness plane for IPC and IPC+LMWH compared with LMWH alone.

Figure 3 Likelihood of cost-effectiveness of IPC+LMWH by the number of days of combined use.

Notes: In the base case, IPC+LMWH is used while in hospital (3 days in USA and 5 days in Australia) followed by LMWH after discharge. As the number of days that IPC+LMWH is used, the likelihood of it being cost-effective increases. By 7 days, it is extremely likely to be considered cost-effective versus LMWH (A) but <50% of simulations would be considered cost-effective versus IPC alone (B). All data from 500 sensitivity analyses were performed for each length of combined IPC+LMWH prophylaxis.
Abbreviations: Aus, Australia; IPC, intermittent pneumatic compression; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin.
Figure 3 Likelihood of cost-effectiveness of IPC+LMWH by the number of days of combined use.

Figure 4 Uncertainty in model outcomes.

Notes: Box plots show the distribution of data from 500 sensitivity analyses, with IPC depicted in white and IPC+LMWH in gray. Data for the USA have a solid black outline, whereas Australian data have a dashed-black outline.
Abbreviations: IPC, intermittent pneumatic compression; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; QALY, quality-adjusted life year.
Figure 4 Uncertainty in model outcomes.