88
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Cost-effectiveness model for a hypothetical monotherapy vs standard of care in adult patients with treatment-resistant depression

, , , &
Pages 257-270 | Published online: 14 Mar 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1 Decision tree component of the model.

Abbreviation: TRD, treatment-resistant depression.
Figure 1 Decision tree component of the model.

Figure 2 Markov component of the model.

Note: For all health states, patients can also remain in their current health state (circular arrows for remaining in state are not illustrated).
Figure 2 Markov component of the model.

Table 1 Summary of treatment-specific model inputs

Table 2 Summary of treatment-unspecific model inputs

Table 3 Simulated acute treatment efficacy

Table 4 Base case model results

Figure 3 Deterministic sensitivity analysis on INMB at WTP of £30,000 per QALY for the hypothetical monotherapy with both efficacy and tolerability advantages.

Abbreviations: AAP, atypical antipsychotics; INMB, incremental net monetary benefit; MADRS, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; WTP, willingness-to-pay.
Figure 3 Deterministic sensitivity analysis on INMB at WTP of £30,000 per QALY for the hypothetical monotherapy with both efficacy and tolerability advantages.

Figure 4 Cost-effectiveness plane for the hypothetical monotherapy with both efficacy and tolerability advantages.

Abbreviation: QALY, quality-adjusted life year.
Figure 4 Cost-effectiveness plane for the hypothetical monotherapy with both efficacy and tolerability advantages.

Figure 5 Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for the hypothetical monotherapy with both efficacy and tolerability advantages.

Abbreviations: AAP, atypical antipsychotics; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; WTP, willingness-to-pay.
Figure 5 Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for the hypothetical monotherapy with both efficacy and tolerability advantages.

Figure 6 Combinations of acute treatment discontinuation and efficacy percentage advantages over SSRI + AAP that result in dominance of the hypothetical monotherapy (lower costs and higher QALYs).

Note: Results were based on a 50% price premium of the hypothetical monotherapy over SSRI + AAP.
Abbreviations: AAP, atypical antipsychotics; QALYs, quality-adjusted life years; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Figure 6 Combinations of acute treatment discontinuation and efficacy percentage advantages over SSRI + AAP that result in dominance of the hypothetical monotherapy (lower costs and higher QALYs).

Table S1 Commonly prescribed drugs and the weighted monthly costs used in the model

Table S2 ICUR of the hypothetical monotherapy for different combinations of acute treatment discontinuation and efficacy percentage advantages over SSRI + AAP

Table S3 Optimal monthly prices of the hypothetical monotherapy for different combinations of acute treatment discontinuation and efficacy percentage advantages over SSRI + AAP at WTP per QALY of £30,000