266
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Cost-Effectiveness of Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft i-Factor versus Use of Local Autologous Bone in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery

, , , , &
Pages 681-691 | Published online: 24 Jul 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1 Markov model depicts patient’s health and work status at each follow-up period. Each node represents transition to health states associated with different costs and utility scores.

Figure 1 Markov model depicts patient’s health and work status at each follow-up period. Each node represents transition to health states associated with different costs and utility scores.

Table 1 Probability of Complications Depending on Preoperative Health Care Status

Table 2 Direct Surgical Costs

Table 3 Base Case Results with Medicare and Private Rates (Both Perspectives)

Table 4 Scenario Sensitivity Analyses: Cost-Effectiveness of P-15 vs Control in Alternative Scenarios

Figure 2 (A) Cost-effectiveness scatter plot representing 5,000 simulated iteration of input parameter variations. The resultant difference in increments of cost vs effectiveness is illustrated. Simulation points below the WTP line indicate cost-effectiveness. (B) Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves created based on the sensitivity analysis scatter plot. Percentages of iterations achieving cost-effectiveness are plotted for either group based on willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Abbreviation: WTP, willingness-to-pay.
Figure 2 (A) Cost-effectiveness scatter plot representing 5,000 simulated iteration of input parameter variations. The resultant difference in increments of cost vs effectiveness is illustrated. Simulation points below the WTP line indicate cost-effectiveness. (B) Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves created based on the sensitivity analysis scatter plot. Percentages of iterations achieving cost-effectiveness are plotted for either group based on willingness-to-pay thresholds.