119
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes in Canada

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 49-62 | Published online: 24 Jan 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1 Model diagram of the 1-year decision tree.

Abbreviation: MI, myocardial infarction.
Figure 1 Model diagram of the 1-year decision tree.

Table 1 One-year decision tree event probabilities

Figure 2 Diagram of the Markov model for post-1-year.

Note: *This state includes patients who had no events within the year after the incident hospitalization for ACS and patients who had an MI in the first year after the ACS event.
Abbreviations: MI, myocardial infarction; ACS, acute coronary syndrome.
Figure 2 Diagram of the Markov model for post-1-year.

Table 2 Health-related utility values used in the model

Table 3 Resource costs used in the 1-year decision tree and post-1-year Markov model

Table 4 Summary of discounted cost-effectiveness results for different time horizons

Figure 3 Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for ticagrelor versus generic clopidogrel.

Note: All values are in Canadian dollars.
Abbreviations: CEAC, cost-effectiveness acceptability curve; QALY, quality-adjusted life year.
Figure 3 Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for ticagrelor versus generic clopidogrel.

Figure 4 Scatterplot of incremental costs and QALYs for ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel.

Note: All values are in Canadian dollars.
Abbreviations: QALY, quality-adjusted life year.
Figure 4 Scatterplot of incremental costs and QALYs for ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel.

Figure 5 Tornado diagram of one-way sensitivity analyses for ticagrelor versus generic clopidogrel. The light shading represents the higher value for the input and dark shading represents the lower value for the input.

Note: All values are in Canadian dollars.
Abbreviations: MI, myocardial infarction; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; vs, versus.
Figure 5 Tornado diagram of one-way sensitivity analyses for ticagrelor versus generic clopidogrel. The light shading represents the higher value for the input and dark shading represents the lower value for the input.

Table 5 Probabilistic base case results (40 years) – cost per QALY and LY (5,000 simulations)

Table S1 Health state costs used in the first year of the model (2011 costs)

Table S2 Unit costs (2011 Canadian$)

Table S3 Values used in one-way sensitivity analysis

Table S4 Summary of probabilistic sensitivity analysis inputs and distributions

Table S5 Output of one-way sensitivity analyses: incremental cost per QALY for ticagrelor versus clopidogrel

Table S6 Summary of subgroup analysis (40-year time horizon)