134
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Productivity loss and resource utilization, and associated indirect and direct costs in individuals providing care for adults with schizophrenia in the EU5

, , &
Pages 593-602 | Published online: 25 Nov 2015

Figures & data

Table 1 Respondent demographics and health characteristics by caregiver status

Figure 1 Work productivity loss and activity impairment by caregiver status post-propensity matching.

Notes: *P-values reflect significant differences compared with schizophrenia caregiver; ^includes employed respondents only. Means with 95% confidence intervals are presented. The matched noncaregiver and other caregiver groups were matched on age, sex, marital status, education, household income, employment status, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, exercise behaviors, and the CCI.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index.
Figure 1 Work productivity loss and activity impairment by caregiver status post-propensity matching.

Figure 2 Proportion of emergency room visit and hospitalizations by caregiver status post-propensity matching.

Notes: *P-values reflect significant differences compared with schizophrenia caregiver. The matched noncaregiver and other caregiver groups were matched on age, sex, marital status, education, household income, employment status, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, exercise behaviors, and the CCI.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index.
Figure 2 Proportion of emergency room visit and hospitalizations by caregiver status post-propensity matching.

Figure 3 Health care resource utilization by caregiver status post-propensity matching.

Notes: *P-values reflect significant differences compared with schizophrenia caregiver. Means with 95% confidence intervals are presented. The matched noncaregiver and other caregiver groups were matched on age, sex, marital status, education, household income, employment status, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, exercise behaviors, and the CCI.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index.
Figure 3 Health care resource utilization by caregiver status post-propensity matching.

Figure 4 Indirect costs by caregiver status post-propensity matching.

Notes: *P-values reflect significant differences compared with schizophrenia caregiver; ^includes employed respondents only, total indirect costs are the combination of absenteeism and presenteeism costs. Means with 95% confidence intervals are presented. The matched noncaregiver and other caregiver groups were matched on age, sex, marital status, education, household income, employment status, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, exercise behaviors, and the CCI.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index.
Figure 4 Indirect costs by caregiver status post-propensity matching.

Figure 5 Direct costs by caregiver status post-propensity matching.

Notes: *P-values reflect significant differences compared with schizophrenia caregiver, total direct costs are the combination of physician visit, ER visit, and hospitalization costs. Means with 95% confidence intervals are presented. The matched noncaregiver and other caregiver groups were matched on age, sex, marital status, education, household income, employment status, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, exercise behaviors, and the CCI.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; ER, emergency room.
Figure 5 Direct costs by caregiver status post-propensity matching.