Figures & data
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study
Table 2 Regression coefficients for the final multivariate model
Figure 1 ROC and sensitivity and specificity values of BFH-OST for diagnosis of osteoporosis (T-score ≤−2.5SD).
Abbreviations: BFH-OST, Beijing Friendship Hospital Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; +LR, positive likelihood ratio; –LR, negative likelihood ratio; WHO, World Health Organization; BMD, bone mineral density; ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve; SD, standard deviation.
![Figure 1 ROC and sensitivity and specificity values of BFH-OST for diagnosis of osteoporosis (T-score ≤−2.5SD).](/cms/asset/0621ef12-506b-4471-83b0-86765b9599c9/dcia_a_107675_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 3 Summary of descriptive characteristics of the study cohort (n=1,721)
Figure 2 Distribution of T-scores of different sites by BFH-OST.
![Figure 2 Distribution of T-scores of different sites by BFH-OST.](/cms/asset/7c961354-eb8b-41cd-ae51-19235a9f4e89/dcia_a_107675_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 The comparison between OSTA and BFH-OST for the diagnosis of osteoporosis (T-score ≤−2.5).
![Figure 3 The comparison between OSTA and BFH-OST for the diagnosis of osteoporosis (T-score ≤−2.5).](/cms/asset/51b1d321-fb01-4f0c-8601-7574c3f15700/dcia_a_107675_f0003_b.jpg)
Table 4 Distribution of test results for BFH-OST based on either femoral neck or total hip or lumbar spine BMD in the study cohort (n=1,721 females)