Figures & data
Table 1 Comparison of the characteristics of control and KOA group
Figure 1 Measurement of the patellar cartilage cross-sectional area (PCA) on transverse turbo spin echo fat-suppressed T2-weighted image. (A) Control group. (B) Knee tibiofemoral osteoarthritis group.
![Figure 1 Measurement of the patellar cartilage cross-sectional area (PCA) on transverse turbo spin echo fat-suppressed T2-weighted image. (A) Control group. (B) Knee tibiofemoral osteoarthritis group.](/cms/asset/83ab4513-b012-44c5-a12d-39849d9b3f47/dcia_a_205027_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 2 Age distribution of patients with mean PCA of control group
Table 3 Age distribution of patients with mean PCA of KOA group
Table 4 Sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point of the PCA
Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of patellar cartilage cross-sectional area (PCA) for prediction of knee osteoarthritis. The best cutoff point of PCA was 76.06 mm2, with sensitivity of 83.0%, specificity of 83.1% and AUC of 0.94. PCA AUC (95% CI) =0.94 (0.90–0.97).
![Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of patellar cartilage cross-sectional area (PCA) for prediction of knee osteoarthritis. The best cutoff point of PCA was 76.06 mm2, with sensitivity of 83.0%, specificity of 83.1% and AUC of 0.94. PCA AUC (95% CI) =0.94 (0.90–0.97).](/cms/asset/58b71db1-37e8-4e01-a63e-a5ff46e1d3e8/dcia_a_205027_f0002_c.jpg)