Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/d520c127-ad28-4029-b033-18cb0198676a/dcia_a_239350_uf0001_b.jpg)
Table 1 Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Instrument Characteristics
Figure 1 Two-sample Mendelian randomization testing the causal effect of circulating levels of glutamine (Gln) on Alzheimer’s disease (AZD). Estimates of the SNP-Gln association () are calculated in sample 1 (Kettunen et al (2016) GWASCitation9). The association between these same SNPs and AZD (
) is then estimated in sample 2 (IGAP GWAS). These estimates are combined (
=
). The
Wald ratio estimates for each of the four SNPs are meta-analyzed using the inverse-variance weighted (
IVW) method and sensitivity analyses. The IVW method produces an overall causal estimate of circulating glutamine on AZD.
![Figure 1 Two-sample Mendelian randomization testing the causal effect of circulating levels of glutamine (Gln) on Alzheimer’s disease (AZD). Estimates of the SNP-Gln association () are calculated in sample 1 (Kettunen et al (2016) GWASCitation9). The association between these same SNPs and AZD () is then estimated in sample 2 (IGAP GWAS). These estimates are combined (=). The Wald ratio estimates for each of the four SNPs are meta-analyzed using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method and sensitivity analyses. The IVW method produces an overall causal estimate of circulating glutamine on AZD.](/cms/asset/6095a8ff-23c9-44ef-86e2-4715af16fcfe/dcia_a_239350_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2 Individual SNP and multi-instrument MR results for the effect of circulating glutamine on Alzheimer’s disease. In addition to the test of the causal effect of glutamine on Alzheimer’s disease (depicted above), the MR-Egger method provides a test of whether its intercept is different from zero. MR Egger intercept = 0.01; 95% CI −0.03, 0.04; P value=0.60 (four-SNP instrument).
![Figure 2 Individual SNP and multi-instrument MR results for the effect of circulating glutamine on Alzheimer’s disease. In addition to the test of the causal effect of glutamine on Alzheimer’s disease (depicted above), the MR-Egger method provides a test of whether its intercept is different from zero. MR Egger intercept = 0.01; 95% CI −0.03, 0.04; P value=0.60 (four-SNP instrument).](/cms/asset/712c86d4-7b15-4373-8f9a-c9e91df1c7c4/dcia_a_239350_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 Individual SNP and multi-instrument MR results for the effect of Alzheimer’s disease on circulating glutamine. MR Egger intercept (−0.01; 95% CI −0.03, 0.002; P value = 0.09).
![Figure 3 Individual SNP and multi-instrument MR results for the effect of Alzheimer’s disease on circulating glutamine. MR Egger intercept (−0.01; 95% CI −0.03, 0.002; P value = 0.09).](/cms/asset/8dcd76aa-f661-4492-b334-d0422e122b6c/dcia_a_239350_f0003_b.jpg)