273
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Predictive Value of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form in Mortality in Chinese Hospitalized Geriatric Patients

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 441-449 | Published online: 20 Mar 2020

Figures & data

Table 1 Comparison of Basic Baseline Anthropometric and Biochemical Characteristics of Subjects According to NRS2002 and MNA-SF Assessment

Table 2 Correlation of Anthropometric and Biochemical Parameters with NRS2002 and MNA-SF Scores

Table 3 Kappa Test for Agreement in Diagnosing Malnutrition/Nutritional Risk Between NRS2002 and MNA-SF Scores (n=536)

Table 4 Comparison of the Characteristics of the Agreement and Disagreement Patients According to NRS2002 and MNA-SF Assessment

Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier analysis for mortality. (A) Malnutrition/nutritional risk vs normal according to NRS2002 assessment, Log rank test χ2=17.67, P<0.001. (B) Malnutrition/nutritional risk vs normal according to MNA-SF assessment, Log rank test χ2=28.999, P<0.001.

Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier analysis for mortality. (A) Malnutrition/nutritional risk vs normal according to NRS2002 assessment, Log rank test χ2=17.67, P<0.001. (B) Malnutrition/nutritional risk vs normal according to MNA-SF assessment, Log rank test χ2=28.999, P<0.001.

Table 5 Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Analysis of Mortality