137
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The Outcomes of Cemented Femoral Revisions for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in the Elderly: Comparison with Cementless Stems

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1869-1876 | Published online: 27 Oct 2021

Figures & data

Table 1 Demographics of Patients

Figure 1 The study flow-chart.

Figure 1 The study flow-chart.

Table 2 Clinical Results of Patients

Figure 2 Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph of a Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture in a 77-year-old female (A) treated with a long cemented femoral stem (B). At 5 years of follow-up, the fracture was healed and the stem did not show any sign of aseptic loosening.

Figure 2 Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph of a Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture in a 77-year-old female (A) treated with a long cemented femoral stem (B). At 5 years of follow-up, the fracture was healed and the stem did not show any sign of aseptic loosening.

Figure 3 Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph of a Vancouver type-B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture in a 61-year-old man (A) treated with an uncemented femoral revision (B). Fracture was healed and uncemented modular tapered fluted revision stem was well osteointegrated after 1 year of surgery.

Figure 3 Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph of a Vancouver type-B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture in a 61-year-old man (A) treated with an uncemented femoral revision (B). Fracture was healed and uncemented modular tapered fluted revision stem was well osteointegrated after 1 year of surgery.

Table 3 Early and Late Complications