307
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Effect of 5 Years of Exercise Intervention at Different Intensities on Brain Structure in Older Adults from the General Population: A Generation 100 Substudy

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1485-1501 | Published online: 12 Aug 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1 Flowchart describing the process of inclusion into the study and the intervention period. Number (N) of participants at each time point and reasons for exclusion; failed MRI processing (eg due to excessive movement), death and percentages (%) of withdrawal at baseline and after 1, 3 and 5 years of intervention for the MRI study are provided.

Figure 1 Flowchart describing the process of inclusion into the study and the intervention period. Number (N) of participants at each time point and reasons for exclusion; failed MRI processing (eg due to excessive movement), death and percentages (%) of withdrawal at baseline and after 1, 3 and 5 years of intervention for the MRI study are provided.

Table 1 Demographics and Clinical Data for the Control, MICT and HIIT Participants Undergoing Brain MRI at Baseline

Table 2 Linear Mixed Model Analyses of Brain Volumes During 5 Years of Intervention (Model 1) in HIIT and MICT Group Compared to Control Group

Figure 2 Mean and 95% CI for total hippocampal, cortex, thalamus, caudate and white matter volumes (mL) adjusted for ICV at each time point in the control (grey circle), moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) (orange triangle) or high intensity interval training (HIIT) (blue square) groups. See and Supplementary Table 7 for results of statistical comparisons.

Figure 2 Mean and 95% CI for total hippocampal, cortex, thalamus, caudate and white matter volumes (mL) adjusted for ICV at each time point in the control (grey circle), moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) (orange triangle) or high intensity interval training (HIIT) (blue square) groups. See Table 2 and Supplementary Table 7 for results of statistical comparisons.

Figure 3 Mean and 95% CI for CRF, objectively measured as VO2peak, at each time point in the control (grey circle), moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) (orange triangle) and high intensity interval training (HIIT) (blue square) groups. See Supplementary Table 13 for results of statistical comparisons.

Figure 3 Mean and 95% CI for CRF, objectively measured as VO2peak, at each time point in the control (grey circle), moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) (orange triangle) and high intensity interval training (HIIT) (blue square) groups. See Supplementary Table 13 for results of statistical comparisons.

Table 3 Linear Regressions Predicting Brain Volumes Across All Participants After 1, 3 and 5 Years of Intervention Based on Baseline CRF