313
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 1591-1616 | Published online: 28 Aug 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1 Fagan Nomogram to calculate the post-test probability for the TUG FAST in the community-dwelling setting, by drawing a line between the fall risk (pre-test probability, 30% in community-dwelling persons) and the likelihood ratio for a positive (green) or a negative test (red).

Figure 1 Fagan Nomogram to calculate the post-test probability for the TUG FAST in the community-dwelling setting, by drawing a line between the fall risk (pre-test probability, 30% in community-dwelling persons) and the likelihood ratio for a positive (green) or a negative test (red).

Figure 2 Relationship between the prevalence (pre-test probability) and the post-test probability for different cut-off values and fall risk prevalence of the TUG FAST. The dotted line indicates the 30%fall risk prevalence for the community-dwelling setting and the related post-test probability (y-axis) of a positive test and the continuous line for a negative test respectively.

Figure 2 Relationship between the prevalence (pre-test probability) and the post-test probability for different cut-off values and fall risk prevalence of the TUG FAST. The dotted line indicates the 30%fall risk prevalence for the community-dwelling setting and the related post-test probability (y-axis) of a positive test and the continuous line for a negative test respectively.

Figure 3 PRISMA flow diagram of the literature search of this systematic review.

Figure 3 PRISMA flow diagram of the literature search of this systematic review.

Figure 4 Results of the assessment of the methodological quality with the Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). On the left proportion of studies with low, high or unclear risk of bias. On the right the proportion of the studies with low, high, or unclear concerns regarding applicability.

Figure 4 Results of the assessment of the methodological quality with the Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). On the left proportion of studies with low, high or unclear risk of bias. On the right the proportion of the studies with low, high, or unclear concerns regarding applicability.

Table 1 Validity; Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Different Settings, Summary of Findings

Table 2 Inter- Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability for Community-Dwelling Setting, Summary of Findings

Table 3 Validity for Community-Dwelling Setting, Summary of Findings

Table 4 Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability for Nursing-Home Setting, Summary of Findings

Table 5 Validity for Nursing Home Setting, Summary of Findings

Table 6 Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability for Hospital Setting, Summary of Findings

Table 7 Validity for Hospital Setting, Summary of Findings

Table 8 Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability for Combined Setting of Hospitalized and Community-Dwelling Persons, Summary of Findings

Table 9 Validity for Combined Setting of Hospitalized and Community-Dwelling Persons, Summary of Findings