234
Views
63
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The potential of classic and specific bioelectrical impedance vector analysis for the assessment of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 585-591 | Published online: 18 Dec 2012

Figures & data

Table 1 Descriptive and comparative statistics: sarcopenic versus nonsarcopenic individuals

Figure 1 Mean impedance vectors and confidence ellipses from groups with and without sarcopenia.

Abbreviations: D, Mahalanobis distance; H, height; R, resistance; Xc, reactance.
Figure 1 Mean impedance vectors and confidence ellipses from groups with and without sarcopenia.

Table 2 Descriptive and comparative statistics: sarcopenic versus sarcopenic obese men

Figure 2 Mean impedance vectors and confidence ellipses from sarcopenic men with FM% higher or lower than the median value of the sex-specific whole sample. (A) Classic BIVA; (B) specific BIVA.

Abbreviations: D, Mahalanobis distance; FM, fat mass; H, height; R, resistance; sp, specific; Xc, reactance.

Figure 2 Mean impedance vectors and confidence ellipses from sarcopenic men with FM% higher or lower than the median value of the sex-specific whole sample. (A) Classic BIVA; (B) specific BIVA.Abbreviations: D, Mahalanobis distance; FM, fat mass; H, height; R, resistance; sp, specific; Xc, reactance.

Figure 3 The individual specific vectors of sarcopenic men plotted on the sex-specific bivariate tolerance ellipse.

Notes: White dots indicate sarcopenic nonobese men; black dots indicate sarcopenic obese men.
Abbreviations: R, resistance; sp, specific; Xc, reactance.
Figure 3 The individual specific vectors of sarcopenic men plotted on the sex-specific bivariate tolerance ellipse.