Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Interventions in Aging Volume 18, 2023 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
195
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Functional Connectivity and Anxiety Improvement After Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease

Bowen Chang1 Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People’s Republic of China;2 Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Brain Disease, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
,
Jiaming Mei1 Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People’s Republic of China;2 Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Brain Disease, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
,
Chen Ni1 Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People’s Republic of China;2 Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Brain Disease, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
&
Chaoshi Niu1 Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People’s Republic of China;2 Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Brain Disease, Hefei, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 1437-1445 | Received 23 May 2023, Accepted 23 Aug 2023, Published online: 29 Aug 2023

Figures & data

Table 1 Demographic and Clinical Information of the Participants

Table 2 Significant Differences in FC Between HC, aPD, and naPD Groups

Table 3 Significant Differences in FC Between aPD, and naPD Groups

Figure 1 Significant differences in FCs among the aPD, naPD, and HC groups. (A) T-value matrix of functional connectivity between the three groups. (B) Visualization of differential functional connectivity.

Figure 1 Significant differences in FCs among the aPD, naPD, and HC groups. (A) T-value matrix of functional connectivity between the three groups. (B) Visualization of differential functional connectivity.

Figure 2 Significantly different FCs between the naPD and aPD groups. (A) T-value matrix of functional connectivity between the two groups. (B) Visualization of differential functional connectivity.

Figure 2 Significantly different FCs between the naPD and aPD groups. (A) T-value matrix of functional connectivity between the two groups. (B) Visualization of differential functional connectivity.

Table 4 Multivariate Regression for Effect of FC on the HAMA Improvement Rate After STN-DBS

Figure 3 Correlation between FC and anxiety improvement rate after STN-DBS. (A) inferior temporal gyrus and posterior orbital gyrus. (B) Olfactory cortex and inferior frontal gyrus [IFG] pars orbitalis close.

Figure 3 Correlation between FC and anxiety improvement rate after STN-DBS. (A) inferior temporal gyrus and posterior orbital gyrus. (B) Olfactory cortex and inferior frontal gyrus [IFG] pars orbitalis close.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.