The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA

Saurabh Sharma1 Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Shruti Datta1 Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Shahyar Gharacholou1 Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA;2 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Shahzad K Siddique3 Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan

Stephen s Cha4 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Paul Y Takahashi1 Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA;5 Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA;6 Kogod Center of Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Figures & data

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 12,650 adults over 60 who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary interventions or both

Download CSV Display Table

Table 2 Odds of CABG or PCI, by ERA score and demographic predictors, in 12,650 patients over 60

Download CSV Display Table

Figure 1 Receiver operator curve for Elder Risk Assessment Score with the outcome of coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention.

Note: The AUC is 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69–0.73).
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.

Table 3 Hazard ratios for overall mortality in 902 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention, by ERA score

Download CSV Display Table

Table 4 Hazard ratios for overall mortality for all 12,650 primary care patients, by ERA score with added coronary revascularization term

Download CSV Display Table

Figure 2 Time to mortality for 902 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention, according to ERA score.

Notes: The figure shows the Kaplan–Meier survival curves for patients who had undergone CABG or PCI. The higher ERA scores had lower percent survival at 5 years.
Abbreviations: CABG; coronary artery bypass graft; ERA, Elder Risk Assessment; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 12,650 adults over 60 who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary interventions or both

Table 2 Odds of CABG or PCI, by ERA score and demographic predictors, in 12,650 patients over 60

Table 3 Hazard ratios for overall mortality in 902 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention, by ERA score

Table 4 Hazard ratios for overall mortality for all 12,650 primary care patients, by ERA score with added coronary revascularization term

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA

Figures & data

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 12,650 adults over 60 who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary interventions or both

Table 2 Odds of CABG or PCI, by ERA score and demographic predictors, in 12,650 patients over 60

Table 3 Hazard ratios for overall mortality in 902 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention, by ERA score

Table 4 Hazard ratios for overall mortality for all 12,650 primary care patients, by ERA score with added coronary revascularization term

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date