Figures & data
Table 1 Equations to estimate glomerular filtration rateTable Footnotea
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of enrolled elderly subjectsTable Footnotea
Table 3 Overall performance of the equationsTable Footnotea
Figure 1 Bland–Altman analysis measured and plotted to intuitively compare eGFR with rGFR. Horizontal solid lines represent the mean difference between methods. Horizontal dashed lines represent 95% limits of agreement. GFR was measured in mL/min/1.73 m2. (A) CKD-EPIscr, (B) CKD-EPIcys, (C) CKD-EPIscr-cys, (D) Jscr, (E) Jcys, (F) BISscr, (G) BISscr-cys, (H) CEscr, (I) Ccys, and (J) Cscr-cys.
![Figure 1 Bland–Altman analysis measured and plotted to intuitively compare eGFR with rGFR. Horizontal solid lines represent the mean difference between methods. Horizontal dashed lines represent 95% limits of agreement. GFR was measured in mL/min/1.73 m2. (A) CKD-EPIscr, (B) CKD-EPIcys, (C) CKD-EPIscr-cys, (D) Jscr, (E) Jcys, (F) BISscr, (G) BISscr-cys, (H) CEscr, (I) Ccys, and (J) Cscr-cys.](/cms/asset/9c4302f1-0468-47a4-824c-813c9a238d33/dcia_a_68801_f0001_c.jpg)
![Figure 1 Bland–Altman analysis measured and plotted to intuitively compare eGFR with rGFR. Horizontal solid lines represent the mean difference between methods. Horizontal dashed lines represent 95% limits of agreement. GFR was measured in mL/min/1.73 m2. (A) CKD-EPIscr, (B) CKD-EPIcys, (C) CKD-EPIscr-cys, (D) Jscr, (E) Jcys, (F) BISscr, (G) BISscr-cys, (H) CEscr, (I) Ccys, and (J) Cscr-cys.](/cms/asset/7c49c9d2-9a99-40fa-b32b-3a025b275ca0/dcia_a_68801_f0001a_c.jpg)
Table 4 Diagnosis consistency and misclassification rate of the equationsTable Footnotea
Table 5 GFR-specific performance of the equationsTable Footnotea
Table 6 Age-specific performance of the equations