85
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Evaluation of algorithms for registry-based detection of acute myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention

, , , , , & show all
Pages 415-423 | Published online: 19 Oct 2016

Figures & data

Table 1 Algorithms for detection of acute myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention in the Danish National Patient Registry

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of patients with percutaneous coronary intervention

Figure 1 Sensitivity vs 1-positive predictive value for algorithms A–F.

Notes: A, diagnosis type: primary or secondary, all inpatients; B, diagnosis type: primary, all inpatients; C, diagnosis type: primary or secondary and acute admission; D, diagnosis type: primary and acute admission; E, diagnosis type: primary or secondary and acute admission at a hospital with coronary angiography capability; and F, diagnosis type: primary and acute admission at a hospital with coronary angiography capability.
Abbreviation: PPV, positive predictive value.
Figure 1 Sensitivity vs 1-positive predictive value for algorithms A–F.

Table 3 Performance of algorithms for detection of acute myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention in the Danish National Patient Registry

Table 4 Performance of algorithm C (all acute admissions with acute myocardial infarction as primary or secondary discharge diagnosis) across subgroups

Table S1 Two-way table for detection algorithm A

Table S2 Two-way table for detection algorithm B

Table S3 Two-way table for detection algorithm C

Table S4 Two-way table for detection algorithm D

Table S5 Two-way table for detection algorithm E

Table S6 Two-way table for detection algorithm F

Table S7 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified for female sex

Table S8 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified for male sex

Table S9 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified for age ≤ 65 years

Table S10 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified for age > 65 years

Table S11 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified for indication of index stent, acute coronary syndrome

Table S12 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified for indication of index stent, stable angina

Table S13 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on acute myocardial infarction prior to index admission

Table S14 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on acute myocardial infarction at index admission

Table S15 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on no prior acute myocardial infarction

Table S16 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on time from admission, 0–30 days

Table S17 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on time from admission, >30 days to 1 year

Table S18 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on time from admission, < 1 year

Table S19 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on time from admission, 1–2 years

Table S20 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on time from admission, 2–3 years

Table S21 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on time from admission, 3–4 years

Table S22 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on time from admission, 4–5 years

Table S23 Two-way table for algorithm C stratified on time from admission, >30 days to 5 years