Figures & data
Table 1 Recruitment and characteristics of study population in the BLITZ sample evaluating FOB Gold compared to the MSDT study evaluating CologuardCitation7
Table 2 Comparison of diagnostic performance of Cologuard in the MSDT studyCitation7 and of FOB Gold in the BLITZ study
Figure 1 Sensitivity for detecting CRC and APCL ≥1 cm and specificity of FOB Gold (using the original cutoff) compared to Cologuard in the MSDT study (data derived from Imperiale et al),Citation7 with and without age adjustment of FOB Gold results to age distribution of MSDT study population: FIT-O, FOB Gold using original cutoff, no age adjustment; FIT-A, FOB Gold using original cutoff, age adjusted.
![Figure 1 Sensitivity for detecting CRC and APCL ≥1 cm and specificity of FOB Gold (using the original cutoff) compared to Cologuard in the MSDT study (data derived from Imperiale et al),Citation7 with and without age adjustment of FOB Gold results to age distribution of MSDT study population: FIT-O, FOB Gold using original cutoff, no age adjustment; FIT-A, FOB Gold using original cutoff, age adjusted.](/cms/asset/6b920c41-1e4c-4547-add9-72a33bccf353/dcle_a_136565_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 3 Comparison of site-specific sensitivity of Cologuard in the MSDT studyCitation7 and of FOB Gold in the BLITZ study