64
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Prenatal exposure to antipsychotic medication and use of primary health care system in childhood: a population-based cohort study in Denmark

, , , , , & show all
Pages 657-666 | Published online: 01 Dec 2017

Figures & data

Table 1 Characteristics of the children prenatally exposed and unexposed to AP medication and their mothers at the time of the index pregnancy; mean (SD) or proportion

Figure 1 Type of GP contact by age of the children in 1-year intervals comparing prenatally AP-exposed and AP-unexposed children; unadjusted mean number of contacts in top panels and adjusted IRRs (95% CI) in bottom panels.

Notes: IRRs and 95% CIs were estimated using negative binomial regression applying cluster robust variance to account for correlations in the children’s use of GP services due to multiparity in the mothers. Adjusted for sex and date of birth of the children and for maternal age, parity, cohabitation status, income, education, smoking status, diagnosis of substance abuse, depression and epilepsy as well as use of antiepileptic drugs, antidepressants, benzodiazepines and insulin.
Abbreviations: AP, antipsychotic; CI, confidence interval; GP, general practitioner; IRR, incidence rate ratio.
Figure 1 Type of GP contact by age of the children in 1-year intervals comparing prenatally AP-exposed and AP-unexposed children; unadjusted mean number of contacts in top panels and adjusted IRRs (95% CI) in bottom panels.

Table 2 IRR (95% CI) for type of GP contact and services provided comparing prenatally AP-exposed children to AP-unexposed children

Table 3 IRR (95% CI) for type of GP contact comparing prenatally AP-exposed children to AP-unexposed children stratified on maternal diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorder

Table 4 IRR (95% CI) for type of GP contact comparing prenatally AP-exposed children to children of mothers who used AP medication before, but not during pregnancy

Figure 2 IRR (95% CI) for type of GP contact comparing children prenatally exposed to AP medication with their unexposed siblings.

Notes: IRRs and 95% CIs were estimated using a mixed-model analysis with separate strata for each mother and adjusted for sex and date of birth of the children and for maternal age, parity, cohabitation status, income, education, smoking status, diagnosis of substance abuse, depression and epilepsy as well as use of antiepileptic drugs, antidepressants, benzodiazepines and insulin.
Abbreviations: AP, antipsychotic; CI, confidence interval; GP, general practitioner; IRR, incidence rate ratio.
Figure 2 IRR (95% CI) for type of GP contact comparing children prenatally exposed to AP medication with their unexposed siblings.

Figure 3 Type of AP medication and IRR (95% CI) for total GP contacts.

Notes: IRRs and 95% CIs were estimated using negative binomial regression applying cluster robust variance to account for correlations in the children’s use of GP services due to multiparity in the mothers. Adjusted for sex and date of birth of the children and for maternal age, parity, cohabitation status, income, education, smoking status, diagnosis of substance abuse, depression and epilepsy as well as use of antiepileptic drugs, antidepressants, benzodiazepines and insulin. aFirst-generation AP medication.b Second-generation AP medication.
Abbreviations: AP, antipsychotic; CI, confidence interval; GP, general practitioner; IRR, incidence rate ratio.
Figure 3 Type of AP medication and IRR (95% CI) for total GP contacts.