170
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Perioperative Complications of Hysterectomy After a Previous Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1089-1098 | Published online: 31 Dec 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram.

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram.

Figure 2 Risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort (left; 24 studies) and case-control studies (right; two studies).

Figure 2 Risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort (left; 24 studies) and case-control studies (right; two studies).

Figure 3 Meta-analysis of associations between previous cesarean delivery and perioperative complications in subsequent hysterectomy.

Abbreviations: k, number of studies; n, number reported outcomes; OR, odds ratio; previous CS, previous cesarean section; , sampling variance; , variance between reported outcomes from the same study; , variance between studies; NA, not applicable.
Figure 3 Meta-analysis of associations between previous cesarean delivery and perioperative complications in subsequent hysterectomy.

Figure 4 Meta-analysis of associations between previous cesarean delivery and perioperative complications in subsequent hysterectomy according to the study design.

Abbreviations: k, number of studies; n, number reported outcomes; OR, odds ratio; previous CS, previous cesarean section; , sampling variance; , variance between reported outcomes from the same study; , variance between studies; NA, not applicable.
Figure 4 Meta-analysis of associations between previous cesarean delivery and perioperative complications in subsequent hysterectomy according to the study design.

Table 1 Subgroup Analysis According to Routes of Operation

Table 2 Sensitivity Analysis by Excluded High Risk of Bias Studies