Figures & data
Figure 2 Risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort (left; 24 studies) and case-control studies (right; two studies).
![Figure 2 Risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort (left; 24 studies) and case-control studies (right; two studies).](/cms/asset/df1af1a1-1771-4a52-8bed-cce54f7c33d8/dcle_a_12163178_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Meta-analysis of associations between previous cesarean delivery and perioperative complications in subsequent hysterectomy.
![Figure 3 Meta-analysis of associations between previous cesarean delivery and perioperative complications in subsequent hysterectomy.](/cms/asset/00660965-2081-4751-b313-43571838a791/dcle_a_12163178_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Meta-analysis of associations between previous cesarean delivery and perioperative complications in subsequent hysterectomy according to the study design.
![Figure 4 Meta-analysis of associations between previous cesarean delivery and perioperative complications in subsequent hysterectomy according to the study design.](/cms/asset/9f71886c-4107-4b44-b4a5-7ef0c43b0e59/dcle_a_12163178_f0004_b.jpg)
Table 1 Subgroup Analysis According to Routes of Operation
Table 2 Sensitivity Analysis by Excluded High Risk of Bias Studies