162
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Importance of Reporting Complete Procedures of Identifying Patients from the Danish National Patient Registry: The Case of Neonatal Jaundice and Epilepsy

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 445-452 | Published online: 06 Apr 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1 Illustration of the data in the administrative table a(the 3rd section) and diagnostic table b(the 4th section) for 9 persons (each had a unique person’s identification number “pnr” and was marked with a color) including main variables c, diagnostic ICD codes d, and diagnostic types ein the Danish National Patient Registry using diagnosis of epilepsy as an example, and process in identifying patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy including categorization the diagnoses (a primary or secondary diagnosis f, a referral diagnosis g, and an associated diagnosis h) (the 5th section), groups of persons according to their diagnoses i, j, k (the 2nd section), and persons identified by approach 1l and 2m (the 1st section) n.

Notes: aThe administrative table contains one observation for one hospital contact with a unique ‘recnum’. bThe diagnostic table contains one or more observations related to one hospital contact. cLabel of variables. pnr: Person’s identification. recnum: Administrative record number of hospital contacts. c_adiag: Primary diagnosis of the hospital contact. c_diag: All diagnostic information including primary, secondary, referral diagnosis, and additional diagnostic information to the primary, secondary, referral diagnosis . c_diagtype: Type of diagnosis. c_tildiag: Additional diagnostic codes to the primary, secondary, referral diagnosis, if any. dDG40: G40 is the ICD 10 code for epilepsy, which is added a capital D in the data; DZ03: an example of Z-codes in the ICD 10 ranging from DZ00-DZ99. Dxxx: other codes besides codes for epilepsy and Z-codes. eValue of the variable ‘c_diagtype’ (type of diagnosis). A: Main / primary diagnosis. B: Auxiliary / secondary diagnosis. C: Complication. G: Basic diagnosis when the basic diagnosis is different from the main diagnosis. H: Referral diagnosis. +: indicates that the diagnosis in the variable ‘c_diag’ has an associated diagnosis and that the associated diagnosis is stated in the variable ‘c_tildiag’. fWe identified a primary or secondary diagnosis when the diagnostic observation with the variable ‘c_diag’ was coded with the codes of interest (epilepsy or jaundice), and the variable ‘c_diagtype’ was coded with ‘A, B, G, and C’. However, the number of observations with the value ‘G and C’ were few. gA referral diagnosis which was the diagnosis given by the referring physician or hospital / department as a reason for referral. hAn associated diagnosis which was originated from the additional codes to a primary, secondary, or referral diagnosis in the DNPR. iGroup 1: persons who had a primary or secondary diagnosis and a referral or an associated diagnosis as well (person 1, 2, 3), jGroup 2: persons who had a primary or secondary diagnosis only (person 4, 5, 6). kGroup 3: persons with a referral or an associated diagnosis only (7,8, 9). lApproach 1: Procedures of identifying persons with a disease diagnosis, epilepsy as an example. 1. Link the administrative data with the diagnoses data. 2. Identify all records if the variable ‘c_diag’ or ‘c_tildiag’ contained the code of interest for the diagnosis, DG40-DG41 for epilepsy. 3. Exclude records for the referral diagnosis if the variable ‘c_diagtype’ was coded with ‘H’. mApproach 2: Procedures of identifying persons with a disease diagnosis, epilepsy as an example. 1. Exclude hospital contacts if the variable ‘c_adiag’ was coded with Z00 – Z99. 2. Link the administrative data with the diagnoses data. 3. Identify all records if the variable ‘c_diag’ or ‘c_tildiag’ contained the code of interest for the diagnosis, DG40-DG41 for epilepsy. 4. Exclude records for the referral diagnosis if the variable ‘c_diagtype’ was coded with ‘H’.. 5. Exclude records if the variable ‘c_diag’ was coded with Z00 – Z99. nApproach 1 identified person 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 with a diagnosis of epilepsy excepting person 7. Approach 2 identified person 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9 with a diagnosis of epilepsy excepting for person 6, 7, 8.
Figure 1 Illustration of the data in the administrative table a(the 3rd section) and diagnostic table b(the 4th section) for 9 persons (each had a unique person’s identification number “pnr” and was marked with a color) including main variables c, diagnostic ICD codes d, and diagnostic types ein the Danish National Patient Registry using diagnosis of epilepsy as an example, and process in identifying patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy including categorization the diagnoses (a primary or secondary diagnosis f, a referral diagnosis g, and an associated diagnosis h) (the 5th section), groups of persons according to their diagnoses i, j, k (the 2nd section), and persons identified by approach 1l and 2m (the 1st section) n.

Table 1 Summary of Persons with a Hospital Contact Related to Neonatal Jaundice and Summary of Approach 1 and Approach 2 in Identifying Persons with a Diagnosis of Neonatal Jaundice Among the Study Population of Singletons Born Between 01 Jan 1997 and 30 Nov 1996 in Denmark (N=1,186,683)

Table 2 Summary of Persons with a Hospital Contact Related to Epilepsy and Summary of Approach 1 and Approach 2 in Identifying Persons with a Diagnosis of Epilepsy Among the Study Population of Singletons Born Between 01 Jan 1997 and 30 Nov 1996 in Denmark (N=1,183,273a)