159
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REVIEW

Anticancer Drugs Compared to No Anticancer Drugs in Patients with Advanced Hepatobiliary Cancer: A Mapping Review and Evidence Gap Map

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1069-1085 | Received 20 Jul 2023, Accepted 14 Oct 2023, Published online: 09 Nov 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1 PRISMA flowchart. *Five studies provided data and were included in more than one review. Adapted from Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. Creative Commons.

Figure 1 PRISMA flowchart. *Five studies provided data and were included in more than one review. Adapted from Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. Creative Commons.

Table 1 Characteristics of the Included Studies Providing Data for Advanced Liver Cancer

Figure 2 Evidence map for ACD in advanced liver cancer. The size of each dot represents the number of studies that address the intervention/outcome relationship. The color of each dot represents the methodological design of the study group.

Figure 2 Evidence map for ACD in advanced liver cancer. The size of each dot represents the number of studies that address the intervention/outcome relationship. The color of each dot represents the methodological design of the study group.

Figure 3 Summary of the direction of the effect for each study and outcome in patients with advanced liver cancer.

Abbreviations: OBS, observational study; RCT, randomized control trial; SR, systematic review; CT, chemotherapy; BIO/TT, biological/target therapy; IT, immunotherapy; OS, Overall Survival. PFS, Progression-free survival; mo, Months; FI, Favors intervention (ACD); ND, No difference; FC, Favors comparison (BSC/placebo); NR, Not reported.
Figure 3 Summary of the direction of the effect for each study and outcome in patients with advanced liver cancer.

Table 2 Characteristics of the Included Studies on Advanced Gallbladder and Bile Duct Cancers

Figure 4 Evidence map for ACD in advanced gallbladder/bile duct cancers. The size of each dot represents the number of studies that address the intervention/outcome relationship. The color of each dot represents the methodological design of the study group.

Figure 4 Evidence map for ACD in advanced gallbladder/bile duct cancers. The size of each dot represents the number of studies that address the intervention/outcome relationship. The color of each dot represents the methodological design of the study group.

Figure 5 Summary of the direction of the effect for each study and outcome in patients with advanced gallbladder and bile duct cancers.

Abbreviations: OBS, observational study; RCT, randomized control trial; SR, systematic review; CT, chemotherapy; BIO/TT, biological/target therapy; IT, immunotherapy; OS, Overall Survival; PFS, Progression-free survival; mo, Months; FI, Favors intervention (ACD); ND, No difference; FC, Favors comparison (BSC/placebo); NR, Not reported.
Figure 5 Summary of the direction of the effect for each study and outcome in patients with advanced gallbladder and bile duct cancers.