Figures & data
Figure 1 Representative sections of lung adenocarcinoma tissues with cytoplasmic staining for Cox-2. (A) High expression; (B) low expression.
![Figure 1 Representative sections of lung adenocarcinoma tissues with cytoplasmic staining for Cox-2. (A) High expression; (B) low expression.](/cms/asset/ec2c65f4-91f2-4df6-ab2f-4d72da165ce3/dcmr_a_146897_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Representative sections of lung adenocarcinoma tissues with CD8-positive TILs and cell membrane staining for PD-L1 according to tumor immune microenvironment classification.
![Figure 2 Representative sections of lung adenocarcinoma tissues with CD8-positive TILs and cell membrane staining for PD-L1 according to tumor immune microenvironment classification.](/cms/asset/6a736a0a-0a3b-44c4-99d4-c7dd0042434f/dcmr_a_146897_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1 Relationship between CD8-positive TILs count and biomarkers
Figure 3 The numbers of CD8-positive TILs within cancer cell nest were significantly lower in cases with low PD-L1 expression (A; P=0.010) and high-Cox-2 expression (B; P=0.020). Differences were tested using the Mann–Whitney U-test.
![Figure 3 The numbers of CD8-positive TILs within cancer cell nest were significantly lower in cases with low PD-L1 expression (A; P=0.010) and high-Cox-2 expression (B; P=0.020). Differences were tested using the Mann–Whitney U-test.](/cms/asset/604cf9e3-82fe-496f-81a1-3f0cbb3fc09d/dcmr_a_146897_f0003_b.jpg)
Table 2 Relationship of PD-L1 and Cox-2 expression and clinicopathological factors
Table 3 Relationship of tumor immune microenvironment and clinicopathological factors
Figure 4 Comparison of recurrence-free survival rates between patients with high CD8-positive TILs counts versus those with low CD8-positive TILs counts (A), high PD-L1 expressions versus low PD-L1 expressions (B), and tumor microenvironment type IV versus type I versus type II versus type III (C). P=0.038, 0.006, and 0.002, respectively.
![Figure 4 Comparison of recurrence-free survival rates between patients with high CD8-positive TILs counts versus those with low CD8-positive TILs counts (A), high PD-L1 expressions versus low PD-L1 expressions (B), and tumor microenvironment type IV versus type I versus type II versus type III (C). P=0.038, 0.006, and 0.002, respectively.](/cms/asset/baa09787-7397-47da-8bca-d43799df12dd/dcmr_a_146897_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5 Comparisons of recurrence-free survival rates between patients with high Cox-2 expression versus low Cox-2 expression, according to tumor microenvironment status: type I (A), type II (B), type III (C), and type IV (D). P=0.616, 0.021, 0.842, and 0.208, respectively.
![Figure 5 Comparisons of recurrence-free survival rates between patients with high Cox-2 expression versus low Cox-2 expression, according to tumor microenvironment status: type I (A), type II (B), type III (C), and type IV (D). P=0.616, 0.021, 0.842, and 0.208, respectively.](/cms/asset/92ca2369-1fd2-4bed-a0fa-21e19f0cb228/dcmr_a_146897_f0005_b.jpg)
Table 4 Results of the univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses of recurrence-free survival