Figures & data
Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics
Table 2 Baseline tumor characteristics
Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on tumor characteristics.
Notes: There were no statistically significant differences comparing T- and N-stage at the time of diagnosis or number of CRLM at the time of IRE. (A) T1/2 and T3/4. (B) N0, N1, and N2. (C) One or more than one (2+) hepatic metastases.
Abbreviations: CRLM, colorectal liver metastases; IRE, irreversible electroporation.
Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on patient characteristics.
Notes: No statistically significant difference was detected between gender and age. (A) Female (F) and male (M). (B) Young (Y) and old (O) patients, split by the median.
Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on IRE treatment characteristics.
Notes: Comparison of size of CRLM subjected to IRE and time of IRE after diagnosis, no statistically significant difference was found. (A) Size of the treated metastasis (smaller vs ≥2 cm). (B) Early (E) or late (L) IRE, split by the median.
Abbreviations: CRLM, colorectal liver metastases; IRE, irreversible electroporation.
Table 3 Survival after IRE
