336
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Clinical value of ROMA index in diagnosis of ovarian cancer: meta-analysis

, , &
Pages 2545-2551 | Published online: 28 Mar 2019

Figures & data

Table 1 Literature inclusion basic information

Figure 1 Sensitivity forest map of the ROMA index for diagnosis of ovarian cancer (random effect model).

Figure 1 Sensitivity forest map of the ROMA index for diagnosis of ovarian cancer (random effect model).

Figure 2 Specific forest map for diagnosis of ovarian cancer with the ROMA index (random effect model).

Figure 2 Specific forest map for diagnosis of ovarian cancer with the ROMA index (random effect model).

Figure 3 Positive predictive value of the ROMA index for diagnosis of ovarian cancer forest map (random effect model).

Figure 3 Positive predictive value of the ROMA index for diagnosis of ovarian cancer forest map (random effect model).

Figure 4 Negative predictive value of the ROMA index for diagnosis of ovarian cancer forest chart (random effect model).

Figure 4 Negative predictive value of the ROMA index for diagnosis of ovarian cancer forest chart (random effect model).

Figure 5 Area under ROC curve (AUC) of the ROMA index for diagnosis of ovarian cancer forest chart (random effect model).

Figure 5 Area under ROC curve (AUC) of the ROMA index for diagnosis of ovarian cancer forest chart (random effect model).

Figure 6 ROMA index evaluation of ovarian cancer risk bias analysis inverted funnel graph.

Abbreviation: RD, risk difference.

Figure 6 ROMA index evaluation of ovarian cancer risk bias analysis inverted funnel graph.Abbreviation: RD, risk difference.