76
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

A Meta-Analysis And Systematic Review Of Accuracy Of Endoscopic Ultrasound For N Staging Of Gastric Cancers

, , , , &
Pages 8755-8764 | Published online: 27 Sep 2019

Figures & data

Table 1 Main Features Of The 50 Eligible Studies (N=5223) Included Studies

Figure 1 Flowchart illustrating the selection of studies.

Figure 1 Flowchart illustrating the selection of studies.

Figure 2 Graphical display for QUADAS-2 results regarding the proportion of studies with low, high, or unclear risk of bias.

Figure 2 Graphical display for QUADAS-2 results regarding the proportion of studies with low, high, or unclear risk of bias.

Figure 3 EUS diagnostic performance to distinguish lymph node-positive from lymph node-negative tumors: forest plot of the studies included in the meta-analysis.

Figure 3 EUS diagnostic performance to distinguish lymph node-positive from lymph node-negative tumors: forest plot of the studies included in the meta-analysis.

Figure 4 Hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) (solid line) plot with summary point with 95% CI area (circled area).

Figure 4 Hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) (solid line) plot with summary point with 95% CI area (circled area).

Figure 5 EUS diagnostic performance to distinguish lymph node-positive from lymph node-negative tumors: Fagan plot (Bayesian nomogram).

Figure 5 EUS diagnostic performance to distinguish lymph node-positive from lymph node-negative tumors: Fagan plot (Bayesian nomogram).

Table 2 Subgroup And Sensitivity Analysis For N0 Versus N+ Gastric Tumors