82
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Metastasectomy Improves the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients with Krukenberg Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis of 182 patients

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 10573-10580 | Published online: 18 Dec 2019

Figures & data

Table 1 Clinical Characteristics of 94 Patients with Synchronous Krukenberg Tumors

Table 2 Clinical Characteristics of 88 Patients with Metachronous Krukenberg Tumors

Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival in patients with synchronous Krukenberg tumors who did or did not undergo metastasectomy.

Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival in patients with synchronous Krukenberg tumors who did or did not undergo metastasectomy.

Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival in patients with metachronous Krukenberg tumors who did or did not undergo metastasectomy.

Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival in patients with metachronous Krukenberg tumors who did or did not undergo metastasectomy.

Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival in patients who underwent metastasectomy according to the residual disease state. The residual disease state of each patient was documented as the presence or absence of gross residual disease, which was classified as negative resection margins (R0), microscopic tumor infiltration (R1), and macroscopic residual tumor (R2).

Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival in patients who underwent metastasectomy according to the residual disease state. The residual disease state of each patient was documented as the presence or absence of gross residual disease, which was classified as negative resection margins (R0), microscopic tumor infiltration (R1), and macroscopic residual tumor (R2).

Table 3 Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Overall Survival in 182 Patients