Figures & data
Figure 1 ROC curves for NLR and PLR. The ROC curve for NLR is indicated by the blue line. The ROC curve for PLR is indicated by the green line.
![Figure 1 ROC curves for NLR and PLR. The ROC curve for NLR is indicated by the blue line. The ROC curve for PLR is indicated by the green line.](/cms/asset/110429f5-243c-4248-a7c7-f4f13458b866/dcmr_a_12189836_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1 Clinicopathological Characteristics of 167 Patients, Grouped by NLR and PLR
Figure 2 Correlation between the NLR and PLR (r = 0.614, P < 0.001).
![Figure 2 Correlation between the NLR and PLR (r = 0.614, P < 0.001).](/cms/asset/f4af5733-6201-42b8-b162-cc52b301802e/dcmr_a_12189836_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 DFS curve grouped by NLR. Patients with high NLR (≥2.20) possessed significantly poorer DFS time compared with patients with low NLR (<2.20; P=0.013).
![Figure 3 DFS curve grouped by NLR. Patients with high NLR (≥2.20) possessed significantly poorer DFS time compared with patients with low NLR (<2.20; P=0.013).](/cms/asset/a4d0927d-fda0-481b-9c57-4be606a9c4f5/dcmr_a_12189836_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 DFS curve grouped by PLR. Patients with high PLR (≥110) possessed significantly poorer DFS time compared with patients with low PLR (<110; P=0.083).
![Figure 4 DFS curve grouped by PLR. Patients with high PLR (≥110) possessed significantly poorer DFS time compared with patients with low PLR (<110; P=0.083).](/cms/asset/68601327-7726-4451-b37a-1f00a325c669/dcmr_a_12189836_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 2 Multivariate Analyses in 167 Patients with Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma