95
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium/vilanterol for the management of patients with moderate to very severe COPD using an economic model

, , , , &
Pages 997-1008 | Published online: 24 Mar 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1 Structure of the decision model used.

Notes: aWithin the health states, patients may experience either a severe or a nonsevere exacerbation. bDeath could occur from any health status.
Abbreviation: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
Figure 1 Structure of the decision model used.

Table 1 Clinical efficacy, including change in trough FEV1, exacerbations, and AEs

Table 2 Costs included as model inputs and the utility values for COPD severity and exacerbation severity

Table 3 Base-case analysis results over a lifetime horizon

Figure 2 Cost-effectiveness of UMEC/VI treatment in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: probabilistic sensitivity analyses (A) UMEC/VI compared with TIO and (B) UMEC/VI compared with no long-acting bronchodilator.

Note: Costs are presented in US dollars based on 2015 prices.
Abbreviations: CE, cost-effectiveness; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; TIO, tiotropium; UMEC, umeclidinium; VI, vilanterol.
Figure 2 Cost-effectiveness of UMEC/VI treatment in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: probabilistic sensitivity analyses (A) UMEC/VI compared with TIO and (B) UMEC/VI compared with no long-acting bronchodilator.

Table S1 Transition probabilities for UMEC/VI

Table S2 Transition probabilities for tiotropium bromide

Table S3 Transition probabilities for open dual LAMA + LABA

Table S4 Transition probabilities for no long-acting bronchodilator